Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Jaya Krushna Sethi – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, J
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Pursuant to order dtd.30.10.2025, affidavit filed by Opp. Party No. 3 in Court be kept in record. Copy of the same is provided to the learned counsel for the Petitioner in Court.
3. Heard Mr. R.K. Swain, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. A. Tripathy, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate appearing for the Opp. Parties.
4. The present writ petition has been filed inter alia challenging office order dtd.16.08.2018 so issued under Annexure-6 by Opp. Party No. 3. Vide the said order Petitioner has been assessed with penal rent for the period beyond 17.01.2010 till 18.12.2018, when Petitioner vacated the quarter in question.
5. It is the case of the Petitioner that while continuing as a A.F.A.- cum-Under Secretary to Govt., Department of Higher Education, Petitioner was allotted with quarter bearing No. D-9/5 in Unit-VIII, Bhubaneswar. However, since Petitioner was transferred to Kalahandi as Commercial Tax Officer vide order dtd.23.04.2008 and joined on 28.04.2008, considering the request made by the Petitioner and the resolution issued by the Govt. in the G.A. Department, Petitioner vide le
The necessity of issuing a notice before imposing penal rent upon government employees for occupying quarters post-allotment cancellation is affirmed.
Retrospective penal rent for higher government quarters unjustified after long legitimate occupation with normal charges; prospective application only.
The unauthorized retention of government quarters by a retiree incurs penal rent; rights to occupy such accommodations cease upon retirement, regardless of ongoing litigation.
The retention of government accommodation was legally sanctioned, and the recovery of damage rent was deemed arbitrary and unlawful under constitutional principles and applicable laws.
Speaking orders must cite specific rules justifying actions; mere anecdotal claims insufficient. Postal notice does not substitute physical handover of government quarter per prescribed procedure. Ma....
Unauthorized retention of govt. accommodation post-transfer/dismissal periods attracts damage charges per allotment rules; retrospective levy improper if license fee deducted.
The cancellation of an allotment order without notice constitutes a violation of the principles of natural justice, rendering the order null and legally unsustainable.
Retention of government accommodation on educational grounds requires competent authority's approval; penal rent must adhere to applicable Railway rates, not IRCON rules, when calculating unauthorize....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
