SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 684

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.
M/s. Radha Raman Tradecom Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Sub-Registrar, Barchana, Jajpur and Others – Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 14398 of 2025
Decided On : 17-10-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : G. Mukherjee, S.S. Mohanty
For the Respondents: G. Mohanty, Himanshu Patnaik

A sale certificate issued after an auction sale must be filed in Book 1 by the Sub-Registrar without refusal, as it does not require registration under the Registration Act.

Headnote:(A) Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 89(4) and 17(2)(xii) - Writ Petition under Article 226 and 227 - Validity of Sub-Registrar’s refusal to make entry of sale certificate - Sale certificate issued by the Bank after auction sale does not require registration - Sub-Registrar must file the sale certificate in Book 1 without refusal. (Paras 2, 5, 6)

(B) Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - The authorization for the auction sale and subsequent certificate must be respected in the registration process. (Paras 5, 7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a company that won properties sold at auction due to the default of a loan by another company, sought to have their purchase recorded despite the Sub-Registrar’s refusal based on the Collector's earlier directive concerning unpaid dues.

Findings of Court:
The Sub-Registrar is directed to file the sale certificate pertaining to the auction sale in Book 1 as per law because there is no valid reason to refuse it.

Issues: Whether the Sub-Registrar could legally refuse to file the sale certificate and the implications of Section 89(4) in this context.

Ratio Decidendi: The refusal of the Sub-Registrar to make the entry is legally unfounded as the sale certificate is exempt from registration and should be filed in Book 1 as a matter of record-keeping.

Result: Writ petition allowed; the refusal letter quashed and the Sub-Registrar ordered to make the entry.

Table of Content
1. writ petition filed for quashing registrar's refusal. (Para 1 , 2)
2. opponents filed counter affidavits. (Para 3 , 4)
3. sale certificates do not require registration. (Para 5)
4. apex court clarifies filing process for sale certificates. (Para 6)
5. sub-registrar must comply with statutory duties. (Para 7)
6. writ petition allowed; sub-registrar directed to act. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT :

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.

1. This writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner- company praying for quashing the letter No.948 dated 21.12.2024 of Sub-Registrar, Barchana (Opp. Party No.1) & letter No.3744 dated 31.07.2018 of Collector and District Magistrate, Jajpur (Opp. Party No.4) and to direct the Sub- Registrar, Barchana (Opp. Party No.1) and IGR, Odisha, Cuttack (Opp. Party No.2) to make an Entry to the Certificate of Sale dated 20.11.2024 issued by the State Bank of India, Stressed Asset Management Branch-II (Opp. Party No.5) in Book 1 of its Sub-Registrar’s office as per Section 89(4) of the REGISTRATION ACT , 1908.

2. The factual backgrounds of this writ petition, which prompted the petitioner-company for filing of the same is that, one M/s Sabitri Industries Pvt. Ltd. had incurred loans from Opp. Party No. 5 (SBI Stressed Asset Management Branch-II) and due to default in payment of loan dues of the Opp. Party No.5-Bank by the loanee-M/s. Sabitri Industries Pvt. Ltd. the secured assets of the said loan i.e. landed properties indicated specifically in the Para No.4 of the writ petition were put to public auction as per law and the petitioner was the highest bidder of the said auction amongst other participants of that auction sale and paid the auctioned money and purchased the properties indicated in Para No.4 of this writ petition. So, as per law, the Opp. Party No. 5-Bank issued copy of Certificate of Sale on dated 20.11.2024 containing the said properties to the Sub-Registrar, Barchana (Opp. Party No. 1) for making an entry thereof in Book 1 of its office as per section 89(4) of the REGISTRATION ACT , 1908, but as per letter No.948 dated 21.12.2024, the Sub-Registrar, Barchana (Opp. Party No.1) refused to make entry to the copy of the said sale certificate in Book 1 of its office on the basis of the Letter No.3744 dated 31.07.2018 of the Collector and District Magistrate, Jajpur (Opp. Party No.4), as the Collector and District Magistrate, Jajpur (Opp. Party No.4) had stated in that letter that, the transfer of the properties involved in the copy of the sale certificate has been stopped due to the non-payment of some outstanding dues by the loanee-company i.e. M/s. Sabitri Industries Private Limited. For which, without getting any way, the petitioner being the auction-purchaser of the properties involved in the sale certificate filed this writ petition against the Opp. Parties praying for quashing the letter No.948 dated 21.12.2024 (Annexure-9) of Sub-Registrar, Barchana (Opp. Party No.1) & letter No.3744 dated 31.07.2018 (Annexure-9) of Collector and District Magistrate, Jajpur (Opp. Party No.4) and to direct the Sub-Registrar, Barchana (Opp. Party No.1) and IGR, Odisha, Cuttack (Opp. Party No.2) to make an entry to the properties covered in the copy of sale certificate dated 20.11.2024 issued by the authorized officer of the State Bank of India, Stressed Asset Management Branch-II (Opp. Party No.5) in Book 1 as per Section 89(4) of the REGISTRATION ACT , 1908.

3. All the Opp. Parties have filed their respective counter affidavits. The Opp. Party No.5 has supported the case of the petitioner-company.

4. I have already heard from the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel for the Opp. Party Nos.1 to 4 and the learned counsel for the Opp. Party No.5.

5. Analyzing the provisions of law envisaged in Section 89(4), 17(2)(xii) of the REGISTRATION ACT , 1908 along with the provisions of The Securitization and Reconstruction

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top