Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Eastern Metal & Ferro Alloys Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed to quash cancellation of property sale (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. opposite parties argue legality of certificate entry (Para 4) |
| 3. court analyzes legality of registration and mutation (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. writ petition is dismissed due to lack of merit (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT :
1. This writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner- company praying for quashing the entry made by the Opp. Party No.2 (Sub-Registrar, Dharmasala) in Book No.1 vide Annexure-14 and the order of Mutation vide Annexure-17 passed in respect of the properties under Khata No.87 plot No.279 (after mutation) corresponding to Khata No.10.
The petitioner being dissatisfied with the above e-auction Sale challenged to the same by filing S.A. No.44 of 2024 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Cuttack.
Accordingly, the petitioner deposited Rs.50,00,000/- in 1st installment, but, the Opp. Party No.7 (purchaser of e- auction Sale) filed a Writ Petition vide Writ Petition (Civil) No.12905 of 2024 in this Court praying for directing the Sub- Registrar, Dharmasala (Opp. Party No.2) to make entry of the Sale Certificate-cum-possessi
The court affirmed that the entry of a Sale Certificate in the local registration office is a statutory requirement for record preservation, not subject to compulsory registration, thereby affirming ....
A sale certificate issued after an auction sale must be filed in Book 1 by the Sub-Registrar without refusal, as it does not require registration under the Registration Act.
The court held that a sale certificate, required to be filed in the local registration office under law, cannot be refused based on a status quo order in a related civil suit involving a non-party.
The duty of the Sub-Registrar to amend land records to reflect quashed sale certificates is affirmed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that sale certificates should be filed in Book No.1 under Section 89(4) of the Registration Act without insisting on stamp duty, based on the decis....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner was not liable to pay deficit stamp duty and registration fees, and the impounding of the registered sale certificate was quash....
The court mandated that sale certificates must be duly entered as per Section 89(4) of the Registration Act, allowing for flexibility regarding stamp duty.
Petitioner's entitlement to relief for enforcement of registration obligations without undue stamp duty requirements.
The court affirmed that a sale certificate under Section 89(4) of the Registration Act may be entered without stamp duty, pending decision by a Full Bench.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
