Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SANJEEB K. PANIGRAHI
S.K. Cattle and Poultry Feeds – Appellant
Versus
Japfa Comfeed India Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJEEB K. PANIGRAHI, J.
1. The present Writ Petition has been preferred challenging the entire proceeding in Execution Case No.24 of 2019 pending in the Court of the Learned District Judge, Nabarangpur which arises out of Arbitration award dated 31.8.2013 passed by Learned Sole Arbitrator, Sri S.B. Panse.
I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE:
2. The present Opposite Party is in the business of manufacturing and supply of animal feeds. The present Petitioner had a processing unit and entered into a Storage Agreement dated 1.9.2008 with the Opposite Party for processing of the Opposite Party’s products.
3. As per the terms of the Agreement, the Opposite Party was to supply raw materials and packing material to the present Petitioner. Thereafter, the Petitioner was under the obligation to exclusively process the products of the Opposite Party and maintain inventory.
4. Allegedly, after April, 2009 disputes arose between the Parties due to stoppage of production and consequently, the present Opposite Party terminated the Agreement on 2.5.2009. This is where the dispute arose.
5. The matter was referred to the Ld. Sole Arbitrator. The present Opposite Party claimed a total of Rs.12,91,153
Judicial interference in arbitration proceedings under Articles 226 and 227 is limited to exceptional circumstances, emphasizing respect for arbitral awards and the need to minimize court involvement....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for exceptional circumstances to invoke the court's jurisdiction under Article 226 and 227, the limitations on judicial interference in ar....
Judicial intervention in arbitration matters is limited; grievances arising from private loan agreements should utilize statutory remedies and not public law actions.
Objections under Section 47 of the CPC are not maintainable against arbitral awards under Section 36 of the Arbitration Act, as arbitral awards are not actual decrees.
Judicial intervention under Article 227 is limited; only excess of jurisdiction or clear legal contraventions warrant review, as arbitration matters should primarily be resolved within designated arb....
Section 12 sets out grounds of challenge to person appointed as arbitrator and duty of an arbitrator appointed, to disclose any disqualification he may have.
Interference in arbitration proceedings at any stage is impermissible due to the self-sufficiency of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Parties should avail the statutory remedy provided by the Ac....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the arbitrator's duty to inform the claimant of their failure to communicate their claim and to provide an opportunity to show sufficient cause, an....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
