Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S. K. SAHOO, CHITTARANJAN DASH
Dukha @ Krushna Behera – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defendant's denial and argument. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. witness testimonies supporting conviction. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. prosecution's argument on intent. (Para 7 , 25) |
| 5. court's analysis of mens rea. (Para 8 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. application of ipc sections 301 and 302. (Para 12 , 14) |
| 7. conclusion on the appellant's culpability. (Para 22 , 28) |
| 8. final order and sentencing. (Para 29 , 30) |
Judgment :
Chittaranjan Dash, J.
1. This Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 25.11.1998 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Cuttack in S.T. Case No.78 of 1996 (6/96), wherein the Appellant having been found guilty in the offences under Section 302 /307 of IPC has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life for the offence under Section 302 of IPC while no separate sentence has been imposed for the offence under Section 307 of IPC.
2. The brief facts giving rise to the present Appeal are that the Appellant, being the driver of a Mini Truck bearing Registration No. OR-05C-1646, is alleged to have intentionally caused the death of four persons, namely, Alekha Samal, Rajib Narayan Das, Hrushikesh Rout, and Golakha Chandra
The court confirmed the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, emphasizing that intent to kill a specific individual suffices for culpability, even if unintended victims die, affirm....
It is often difficult to distinguish between culpable homicide and murder as both involve death. Yet, there is a subtle distinction of intention and knowledge involved in both crimes. This difference....
The court reclassified the conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part-II IPC due to lack of intent and motive.
(1) Intention of a person cannot be proved by direct evidence but is to be deduced from the facts and circumstances of a case – ‘Intent’ and ‘knowledge’ cannot be equated with each other – They conno....
The distinction between murder and culpable homicide hinges on intention and circumstances, with the court applying Exception-4 of Section 300 IPC in cases of sudden quarrel.
The court affirmed the conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, highlighting that the accused acted with sufficient intent, despite claims of provocation, based on consistent eyewitness testimoni....
The court distinguished between murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder, ruling that the accused acted impulsively without premeditation, warranting a conviction under Section 304 Part I....
The court reaffirmed that intention and the nature of injuries are critical in distinguishing between murder and culpable homicide under IPC.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
