Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Basudev Ghadei – Appellant
Versus
Collector, Jajpur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction limits after final r.o.r publication. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. challenge to revision legality after seven years. (Para 5) |
| 3. procedural options available for aggrieved parties. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. writ petition granted, order quashed. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT :
1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing the impugned order dated 08.06.2023 (Annexure-7) passed in O.S.S. Revision Case No.07 of 2022 by the Collector, Jajpur (Opp. Party No.1).
Seven years after the final publication of the said R.o.R vide Annexure-B/2, the Tahasildar, Jajpur (Opp. Party No.2) filed a revision before the Collector, Jajpur (Opp. Party No.1) vide O.S.S. Revision Case No.07 of 2022 under Rule 42-A of the OS&S Rules, 1962 praying for cancellation of the R.o.R vide Annexure-B/2 from the name of the petitioner to the name of the State/Government, to which, the petitioner being the Opp. Party in that OSS Revision Case No.07 of 2022 objected on the ground that, the Collector has no power, authority or jurisdiction under law to cancel the finally published R.o.R of the case land vide Annexure-B/2 by the S
The Collector lacked jurisdiction to cancel the final R.o.R after seven years, as the opposing party did not pursue the required legal remedies under the OS&S Act.
Settlement authorities cannot override confirmed property rights without lawful authority; Judicial review ensures adherence to due process in land ownership disputes.
Settlement authorities cannot alter confirmed land assignments without legal basis, emphasizing the need to respect prior land grants and judicial confirmations.
The High Court's orders are binding on subordinate authorities, and failure to follow such orders constitutes a usurpation of judicial authority.
The settlement authorities have acted without jurisdiction in passing the impugned orders and the final publication of the R.O.Rs. under Section 12-B of the Act, 1958 is not sustainable in the eyes o....
A writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 is maintainable when statutory authorities act without jurisdiction, allowing for correction of records even after finalization.
Writ petitions are maintainable where statutory authorities exceed or usurp their jurisdiction, particularly when prior valid leases are ignored, necessitating correction of Record of Rights in favor....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
