Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI
Bhanja Minerals Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Terrier Security Service Ltd – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's legal contentions. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis of jurisdiction and contract. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. court's decision on jurisdiction. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 5. final order and conclusion. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
Judgment :
Sanjeeb K Panigrahi, J.
1. The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition challenging the order dated 09.07.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Commercial Court, Cuttack, in Execution Petition No.177 of 2024, whereby the petitioner’s application to drop the execution proceedingson the ground of lack of jurisdiction was rejected.
I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE:
2. Succinctly put, the facts of the case are as follows:
(i) The petitioner and the opposite party entered into a Master Service Agreement dated 27.01.2020 for the provision of security services to the petitioner’s premises. The agreement contained a dispute resolution clause under the heading “Settlement of Disputes, Governing Law and Jurisdiction,” which provided for arbitration and stipulated that the parties would submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the
The exclusive jurisdiction clause in a contract governs jurisdiction irrespective of the seat of arbitration or the place of hearings, emphasizing the primacy of contract in determining jurisdiction.
Point of Law : There was concurrent jurisdiction conferred on the courts ceased with subject matter in dispute and the courts where arbitration was carried out.
The seat of arbitration clause, fixing the seat of arbitration at New Delhi, resulted in courts at New Delhi being exclusively competent to entertain petitions under the 1996 Act, in exercise of its ....
The determination of the arbitration 'seat' and 'venue' is critical; if the 'venue' does not specify a 'seat', jurisdiction lies with the designated court under the arbitration agreement.
The jurisdiction for arbitration-related applications is governed by the parties' contractual agreement, and courts at the designated location have exclusive jurisdiction, regardless of where the arb....
The designated seat of arbitration establishes exclusive jurisdiction for related applications, affirming that the Commercial Court in Ranchi has jurisdiction over Section 34 applications.
Designation of the seat of arbitration must be clearly expressed; conflicting jurisdiction clauses require a harmonious construction favoring the overarching agreement.
The jurisdiction for appointing an arbitrator lies with the court where the principal agreement was executed, as per Section 11(6), despite a venue specified in an ancillary agreement.
The main legal point established is that the Commercial Court has jurisdiction to entertain execution proceedings arising from an award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, and the award holde....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
