SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 791

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, J.
Manaly Pani – Petitioner
Versus
Chiranjib Mishra - Opposite Party
TRP(C) No.139 of 2025, TRPCRL No.82 of 2025, TRP(C) No.163 of 2025
Decided On : 12-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. A. Sahoo, Adv., Mr. D. Mohanty, Adv.

In matrimonial transfer petitions, the convenience of the wife is paramount, and related proceedings should be consolidated to avoid conflicting decisions.

Headnote:(A) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9 and 13 - Transfer petitions for matrimonial proceedings - Petitioner-Wife sought transfer of divorce proceedings from Dhenkanal to Deogarh citing risks and difficulties in attending Court; the Petitioner-Husband sought opposite - Court emphasizes the convenience of the wife in transfer petitions, and the need to resolve interconnected matters in a single trial to prevent conflicting decisions. (Paras 13, 15)

(B) Convenience of parties - In matters involving matrimonial disputes, the convenience and safety of the wife is a paramount consideration when contemplating transfer of proceedings. (Paras 13, 10)

(C) Multiplicity and conflict - Where two or more proceedings pending between the same parties involve common questions of fact and law, they should preferably be tried together to avoid multiplicity and conflicting outcomes. (Paras 15)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioner-Wife, a deserted individual without support, seeks to transfer divorce proceedings to her local court for safety and convenience while the Petitioner-Husband argued for a transfer to consolidate proceedings.

Findings of Court:
The Petition for transfer from Dhenkanal to Deogarh was allowed for the wife, while requests from the husband were rejected; the cases are to be tried together.

Issues: The main issues were the safety and convenience of the parties, particularly the wife's situation, and the necessity for related cases to be handled together.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court concluded that in transfer petitions, especially involving marriage issues, the wife's convenience must be prioritized, and simultaneous handling of interconnected matters is essential.

Result: TRP

(C) No.139 of 2025 allowed; TRPCRL No.82 of 2025 and TRP

(C) No.163 of 2025 dismissed.

Table of Content
1. overview of pending divorce and maintenance petitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. counsel arguments for transfer petitions. (Para 5 , 6)
3. details on proceedings and concerns of the wife. (Para 7 , 8 , 10)
4. husband's arguments for the transfer petitions. (Para 11 , 12)
5. law on transfer of matrimonial proceedings. (Para 13 , 14)
6. decision to allow wife’s transfer prayer. (Para 15 , 16)
7. directions for re-registering and concluding cases. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
8. communication of judgment for compliance. (Para 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT :

S.K. MISHRA, J.

1. TRP(C) No.139 of 2025 has been filed by the Petitioner- Wife for transfer of proceeding in C.P. No.60 of 2025 filed by the Opposite Party-Husband under section 13 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 for decree of divorce, now pending in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Dhenkanal, to the Court of learned Family Court, Deogarh.

2. TRPCRL No.82 of 2025 has been filed by the Petitioner- Husband for transfer of proceeding in Cr.P.C No.37 of 2024 initiated by the Opposite Party-Wife under section 144 of BNSS for maintenance, now pending in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Deogarh, for transfer of the said proceeding to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Dhenkanal.

3. Similarly TRP(C) No.163 of 2025 has also been filed by the Petitioner-Husband for transfer of proceeding in C.P. No.12 of 2024 filed by the Opposite Party-Wife under section 9 of HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 for Restitution of Conjugal Rights, now pending in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Deogarh, to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Dhenkanal.

4. In all the three transfer petitions, which are on board, the parties being same and the issues pertaining to these transfer petitions, being common, are taken up together for hearing and final disposal vide this common judgment.

5. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

6. Both the learned Counsels for the wife as well as husband, reiterating their respective grounds urged in the transfer petitions, advanced their arguments to justify the prayers made in their respective transfer petitions.

7. Admittedly, at the instance of the Wife namely, Manaly Pani, two proceedings, i.e., Cr.P.C. No.37 of 2024 filed under section 144 of BNSS for maintenance so also C.P. No.12 of 2024 filed by her under section 9 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 for Restitution of Conjugal Rights are pending in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Deogarh.

8. It is further admitted that, after getting notice in the said proceedings, the Petitioner-Husband has filed C.P. No.60 of 2025 under section 13 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 for decree of divorce before the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Dhenkanal.

9. The Petitioner-Wife in TRP(C) No.139 of 2025 has prayed for transfer of proceeding in C.P. No.60 of 2025 from the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Dhenkanal to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Deogarh on the grounds that two of the proceedings, as detailed above, are at present pending before the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Deogarh, which were preferred prior to C.P. No.60 of 2025 filed by the Opposite Party- Husband for decree of divorce before the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Dhenkanal.

10. That apart, further grounds have been urged in TRP(C) No.139 of 2025 that the Petitioner-wife is a deserted lady and having no male member in her family to accompany her on each and every date of posting to attend the proceeding at Dhenkanal. After her desertion she is staying with her parents at Deogarh and is dependent on the income of her father for her livelihood, who is an old and ailing person and is suffering from various diseases. The distance from Deogarh to Dhenkanal would be around 190 K.Ms. and there is no direct communication from Dhenkanal to Deogarh to travel after the Court hours. It is further stated that, if the Wife is asked to appear before the learned Judge, Family Court, Dhenkanal, she will be subjected to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top