SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 438

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
SWARNAMALA BADATYA – Appellant
Versus
Niranjan Badatya – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. P. Bastia, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. K.A. Guru, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA, J.

1. TRP(C) No.165 of 2024 has been preferred by the Petitioner-Wife for transfer of proceeding in C.P. No.165 of 2024 filed by the Opposite Party-Husband under section 13 (1) of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 for decree of divorce, now pending in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Berhampur, to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Rourkela.

2. Similarly, TRPCRL No.72 of 2024 has been preferred by the Petitioner-Husband for transfer of proceeding in Criminal Proceeding No.42 of 2024 initiated by the Opposite Party-Wife under Section 125 of Cr.P.C for maintenance, now pending in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Rourkela to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Berhampur.

3. TRPCRL No.73 of 2024 has also been preferred by the Petitioner-Husband for transfer of proceeding in Crl. Misc. Case No.298 of 2023 preferred by the Opposite Party-Wife under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, now pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M. (P), Uditnagar, Rourkela, to the Court of learned S.D.J.M, Berhampur.

4. In all the three transfer petitions, which are on board, the parties being same and the issues p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top