Kawsar Ara Begum vs State of Odisha

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Ori) 11

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Kawsar Ara Begum – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Khan Mahmoodul Hasan Niamati, Adv.
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. S. Nayak, Addl. Standing Counsel.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for mutation correction (Para 1 , 3)
2. condemnation of non-speaking orders (Para 4 , 5)
3. impugned order not sustainable under law (Para 6)
4. writ petition is meritorious (Para 7)
5. order quashed, remand for fresh decision (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT :

1. This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing the impugned order dated 11.08.2025 (Annexure-3) passed in Mutation Case No.10133/2025 by the Tahasildar, Cuttack (Opp. Party No.2).

3. It appears from the impugned order vide Annexure-3 that, the Mutation Case No.10133/2025 was filed by the petitioner on dated 05.07.2025 before the Tahasildar, Cuttack (Opp. Party No.2) praying for correction of the R.o.R of the case land to her name. Thereafter, the said Mutation Case No.10133/2025 was put up before the Tahasildar, Cuttack (Opp. Party No.2) on dated 08.07.2025. Then, the records of that Mutation Case No.10133/2025 was sent to the R.I. Khasmahal (East).

Thereafter, surprisingly, on dated 11.08.2025 the Tahasildar, Cuttack (Opp. Party No.2) rejected to the Mutation Case No.10133/2025 of the petitioner passing a one line o