SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 833

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.P. ROUTRAY
Nityananda Naik – Appellant
Versus
Prafulla Naik – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Saroj Kumar Padhy, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Tikeram Meher, Advocate.

Table of Content
1. ex-parte decree not appealed against. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
2. plaintiffs request decree correction. (Para 7 , 8)
3. correction petition dismissed. (Para 9)
4. arguments on decree correction scope. (Para 10 , 11)
5. limits of section 152 cpc clarified. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 17)
6. court cannot determine shares without appeal. (Para 16)
7. cmp dismissed. (Para 18)

Judgment :

1. Notice on Opposite Parties 3 to 19 is treated sufficient as per postal tracking report and office note.

3. Present CMP is directed against order dated 23rd September, 2024 of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sohela passed in C.S.F.D. No.47 of 2006 wherein the prayer of the Plaintiffs to correct the decree to the extent of allotting shares to the parties have been refused.

“The suit is preliminarily decreed against the defendants, but as regard to the facts and circumstances without any cost. The parties are directed to effect a partition among themselves having regard to the portions under possession of them and also in the possession of the bonafide purchasers; within two months hence. However, the aggrieved party can approach and enforce the partition through process of law.”

6. On the other hand, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top