SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K. R. MOHAPATRA
Dangra Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
Rama Pradhan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ashit Kumar Dash, Advocate

ORDER

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Order dated 28th March, 2023 (Annexure-5) passed by learned Senior Civil Judge, Balliguda in FDCS No.12 of 2019 (arising out of CS No.12 of 2019) is under challenge in this CMP, whereby allowing an application filed by the Plaintiffs/Opposite Parties under Section 152 CPC, learned trial Court inserted seven Plot numbers, which were not available in the plaint. It also directed to correct the Plot No.250 in Khata No.36.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the Petitioner that the suit was filed for partition and a preliminary decree has been passed. In the plaint, the Plaintiffs described the suit property as under:—

“The suit lands recorded in a joint manner by the Settlement Authorities in the names of Balaram Padhan, Kandha Pradhan and Sadura Pradhan.

Village/ Mouza

Tahasil

Khata No.

Plot Nos.

Total Extent

Grebadi

Daringibadi

30

21, 22, 28, 30, 50, 57, 58, 60, 68, 71, 109, 114, 115, 117, 121, 146, 173, 183, 202 along with 7 other plots

Ha.2.8490

Debari

-do-

36

229, 231, 249, 256, 257, 264, 265, 276, 282 & 250

Ha.2.3970

Paramapanga

-do-

60

857, 878, 879, 880, 881,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top