SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 983

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C.BEHERA, J.
Gopal Bagri - Petitioner
Versus
Sub-Registrar, Dolipur, Jajpur Road, Jajpur and others - Opposite Parties 
W.P.(C) No.39399 of 2023
Decided On : 16-05-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner - Mr. B.N. Mohanty, Advocate.
For the Opposite Parties - Mr. G. Mohanty, Standing Counsel, Mr. J.K. Mohanty,

The duty of the Sub-Registrar to amend land records to reflect quashed sale certificates is affirmed.

Headnote:This judgment involves a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India regarding the correction of land records following the quashing of a sale certificate under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The Petitioner sought to rectify and remove an encumbrance on his properties after a Division Bench had quashed the sale certificate, allowing the petitioner's appeal. The main legal dispute revolved around the duty of the Sub-Registrar to accurately reflect court orders in land records. The writ petition was allowed, directing updates to be made to the encumbrance certificate as per the prior court ruling.

JUDGMEMT :

A.C. Behera, J.

This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for directing the O.P. No.1 (Sub-Registrar, Dolipur, Jajpur Road in the district of Jajpur) to act on the Letter dated 11.10.2023 under Annexure-5 Series of the petitioner and to correct the entries in the books, so as to note the fact of quashing of the sale notice/sale certificate as per order dated 20.03.2017 under Annexure-2.

2. The case of the petitioner is that, he was the guarantor for the loan incurred by the loanee from O.P. No.3 (Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Cuttack) giving his properties covered under Khata No.380/5 Plot No.748, Ac.0.19 decimals under Sukinda Tahasil in the District of Jajpur and Plot No.747 Ac.0.18 decimals under Khata No.380/105 to the Bank (O.P. No.3) as securities for the said loan of the loanee.

On account of default of payment of loan amount by the loanee, the O.P. No.3 (Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Cuttack) enforced the above secured properties of the guarantor/petitioner under Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter called as ‘SARFAESI Act, 2002’) and as per the said Act, 2002, the above properties of the petitioner were auctioned in favour of the O.P. No.2 Purna Chandra Samal and accordingly, a registered sale certificate bearing No.821500822 dated 25.02.2015 (Annexure-1) was issued in favour of the auction purchaser Purna Chandra Samal (O.P. No.2) and the same was registered before the O.P. No.1 (Sub-Registrar, Dolipur).

On being dissatisfied with the above auction of the properties of the petitioner, he (petitioner) filed writ petition vide W.P.(C) No.2795 of 2015 before this Court challenging the above auction sale of his properties under SARFAESI Act, 2002 in favour of O.P. No.2 and also challenged the sale certificate bearing No.821500822 dated 25.02.2015 (Annexure-1) issued in respect of his above properties in favour of Purna Chandra Samal (O.P. No.2) much before the confirmation of the sale on the ground that, he (petitioner) was ready to pay the entire loan amount along with accrued interest thereon which was outstanding against the loanee and to release the auctioned properties as per Annexure-1 in his favour.

3. After hearing to the W.P.(C) No.2795 of 2015 filed by the petitioner, the Division Bench of this Court as per Order dated 20.03.2017 (Annexure-2) allowed that writ petition filed by the petitioner and quashed the sale certificate dated 25.02.2015 (Annexure-1) issued in favour of the O.P. No.2-Purna Chandra Samal in respect of the above properties of the petitioner.

4. In pursuance to the said final Order dated 20.03.2017 (Annexure-2) passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.2795 of 2015, the head office of the O.P. No.3 issued a letter dated 04.06.2019 (Annexure-3) to the O.P. No.3 extinguishing the petitioner’s liabilities with respect to the above properties, those were mortgaged before the O.P. No.3 for the loan of the loanee. Accordingly, the properties of the petitioner covered under the sale certificate vide Annexure-1 were made free from its mortgage without any encumbrance in respect of the same.

Thereafter, when the petitioner being the exclusive owner of the properties covered under the quashed sale certificate vide Annexure-1 wanted to sale the said properties to his prospective vendor and applied for encumbrance certificate, he (petitioner) found from the encumbrance certificate vide Annexure-4 that, the quashed sale certificate as per order passed in Annexure-2 is continuing as encumbrance against his properties covered under Khata No.380/5, Plot No.748, Ac.0.19 decimals under Sukinda Tahasil in the District of Jajpur and Plot No.747 Ac.0.18 decimals under Khata No.380/105 in the same Mouza.

For which, the petitioner requested O.P. No.1 as per letter dated 11.10.2023 (Annexure-5 Series) for deletion of Annexure-1 as an encumbrance ag

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top