SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 874

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
HARISH TANDON, CJ, MURAHARI SRI RAMAN, J.
State of Odisha – Appellant 
Versus
Pabitra Behera S/o Late Dhaneswar Behera – Respondent
W.A. No. 723 of 2025
Decided On : 14-10-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Saswat Das
For the Respondent: Sarat Chandra Mekap

The Sastri qualification is legally equivalent to a Bachelor’s Degree, satisfying the educational requirements for the appointment of a Hindi Teacher (Contractual).

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227 - Writ petition - Quashing of appointment rejection - The Single Bench quashed the Order issued by the Collector based on the qualification criteria for the post of Hindi Teacher (Contractual). The court found that the Sastri qualification is equivalent to a Bachelor’s Degree, enabling the respondent's eligibility. (Paras 1, 6, 9.1)

(B) Recruitment - Eligibility criteria - The eligibility for the post requires 45% marks in aggregate in Bachelor’s or equivalent degree. The Collector’s rejection was based on the erroneous assessment of qualifications, failing to recognize the equivalence of Sastri. (Paras 2.6, 7.1)

Facts of the case:
The respondent, having applied for the Hindi Teacher post, was rejected due to alleged lack of requisite qualifications. The court examined marks and qualifications leading to the conclusion of unfair denial of appointment.

Findings of Court:
The court confirmed that the Sastri qualification is recognized as equivalent to a Bachelor’s Degree and found the rejection on grounds of insufficient marks to be unfounded.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the respondent's qualifications met the requirements for his appointment as a Hindi Teacher (Contractual).

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that the Sastri qualification should be considered equivalent to a Bachelor's Degree, thus fulfilling the eligibility criteria.

Result: The writ appeal was dismissed, reaffirming the Single Bench's decision to appoint the respondent to the vacant post of Hindi Teacher.

Table of Content
1. overview of the case and qualifications involved. (Para 1 , 2)
2. introduction of appeal and main contention regarding qualifications. (Para 3)
3. arguments from the appellants on qualifications and eligibility criteria. (Para 4)
4. respondent's arguments refuting appellants' claims. (Para 5)
5. court's analysis of qualifications and equivalence of 'sastri' degree. (Para 6)
6. interpretation of statutory provisions regarding qualification. (Para 7)
7. references and conclusions drawn from prior relevant cases. (Para 8)
8. final conclusion on the legality of the qualifications and order. (Para 9)
9. final dismissal of the appeal. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT :

MURAHARI SRI RAMAN, J.

1. Legality, propriety and rationality in disposing off the writ petition vide Order dated 28.11.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No.24577 of 2023 by a learned Single Bench of this Court exercising powers under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India quashing Order dated 20.01.2023 issued by the Collector, Angul (Annexure-3 of the writ petition) and directing to appoint the respondent herein (petitioner in the writ petition) as against available vacant post, the appellants- functionaries of the Government of Odisha have preferred the intra-Court appeal provided under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent Constituting the High Court of Judicature at Patna read with Article 4 of the Orissa High Court Order, 1948 and Rule 6 of Chapter-III and Rule 2 of Chapter-VIII of the Rules of the High Court of Orissa, 1948.

Facts:

2. Facts leading to filing of this writ appeal are narrated infra.

2.1. In pursuance of Resolution No.23404—VIII(B)-SME-(X)-32/2014/SME, dated 27.10.2014 issued by the School and Mass Education Department, Odisha in adherence to the General Administration Department Notification No.32010/Gen., dated 12.11.2013 and No.1147/Gen., dated 17.01.2014 read with No.4587/Gen., dated 15.02.2014, which prescribed the rules for recruitment to Group-C, D and B posts respectively, the respondent, having qualification of “Rastrabhasa Sastri” from Odisha Rastrabhasa Parisad, Puri and Bachelor Degree in Arts offered his candidature in Government High School related to the District of Angul for the post of Hindi Teacher (Contractual).

2.2. A Notice dated 04.02.2016 superscribing “for the candidates (Applicants for the Post of Contractual Teacher as per Advertisement 2014-15 (including Advertisement dated 07.01.2016)” has come to be published by the Director, Secondary Education, Odisha wherefrom it is transpired that, “1. More than 40,000 candidates applied for post of Contract Teacher in Government High Schools as per Advertisement 2014-15 (published on 23.10.2014 and 13.01.2015):

2. Again pursuant to Order dated 17.12.2015 passed by the Hon'ble Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack in O.A. No.3589 (C) of 2014 and 137 other cases and consequent upon issue of Corrigendum No.284/SME, dated 06.01.2016 by School and Mass Education Department, Odisha, another Advertisement was published by Director, Secondary Education, Odisha on 07.01.206. In response to this more than 9,000 candidates have submitted online application as on 22.01.2016 (Last Date). Some of them were not eligible to apply as per conditions laid down in Advertisemnt dated 07.01.2016 and so their applications have not been taken into consideration.

3. Out of the candidates who applied as per the Advertisements mentioned in paragraphs (1) and (2) above, a list of candidates has been prepared whose documents shall be verified from 06.02.2016 at district level. The list will be available in the Odisha Primary Education Programme Authority website in link "Tabulation Sheet of Applications for verification of documents" from 06.02.2016 onwards.***”

2.3. The representation for consideration of his case being not attended to, the respondent filed O.A. No.814 (C) of 2017 before the Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench which came to be disposed of with the following observation vide Order dated 21.07.2017

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top