Back
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
State of Odisha – Appellant
Versus
Prasanta Kumar Nayak – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 2) |
| 2. court's analysis on educational qualifications (Para 3 , 4 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. parties' arguments regarding qualifications (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. concluding statement on the irrelevance of the respondent's qualifications in context. (Para 19) |
| 5. the need for reasons in decision-making (Para 22) |
| 6. final decision and conclusion regarding the case result. (Para 28) |
| 7. conclusion and final order of the court (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT
THE CHALLENGE MADE IN THE INTRA-COURT APPEAL:
THE FACTS:
2.1. By filing counter, the Director of Secondary Education asserted that an advertisement was published on 27.10.2014 inviting applications for filling up of 5634 numbers of posts of Contract Teachers in Government High Schools throughout the State of Odisha.
2.3. Later on, upon verification, it is stated by the appellants that citing 'not having requisite qualification', the name of Respondent No.l was placed at Sl. No. 535, in the list of rejected candidates of Contract Teacher (Hindi) published.
2.5. Record of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal reveals that vide Order No.04, dated 13.05.2015, while issuing notice on admission, the followin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
