Back
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
State of Odisha – Appellant
Versus
Prasanta Kumar Nayak – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 2) |
| 2. court's analysis on educational qualifications (Para 3 , 4 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. parties' arguments regarding qualifications (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. concluding statement on the irrelevance of the respondent's qualifications in context. (Para 19) |
| 5. the need for reasons in decision-making (Para 22) |
| 6. final decision and conclusion regarding the case result. (Para 28) |
| 7. conclusion and final order of the court (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT
Murahari Sri Raman, J. -
THE CHALLENGE MADE IN THE INTRA-COURT APPEAL:
Beseeching intervention in the Judgment dated 17.08.2021 rendered in WPC (OAC) No.1629 of 2015, whereby and whereunder allowing writ petition invoking power under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India a learned Single Judge of this Court held that the respondent No.1 had requisite qualification of Bachelor of Education from University recognized by the National Council for Teacher Education having affiliation of the Utkal University, as such is entitled to be considered for engagement as Contract Teacher (Hindi), the appellants, functionaries of the State Government preferred the present intra-Court appeal.
THE FACTS
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
