IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
Chakradhari Sharan Singh, Murahari Sri Raman, JJ.
State of Odisha & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Prasanta Kumar Nayak & Ors. - Respondents
W.A. No.862 of 2022 (In the matter of an Appeal under Article 4 of the Odisha High Court Order, 1948 read with Clause 10 of the Letters Patent constituting the High Court of Judicature at Patna and Rule 6 of Chapter-III and Rule 2 of Chapter-VIII of the Rules of the High Court of Odisha, 1948)
Decided On : 20-05-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 2) |
| 2. court's analysis on educational qualifications (Para 3 , 4 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. parties' arguments regarding qualifications (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. concluding statement on the irrelevance of the respondent's qualifications in context. (Para 19) |
| 5. the need for reasons in decision-making (Para 22) |
| 6. final decision and conclusion regarding the case result. (Para 28) |
| 7. conclusion and final order of the court (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT
Murahari Sri Raman, J. -
THE CHALLENGE MADE IN THE INTRA-COURT APPEAL:
Beseeching intervention in the Judgment dated 17.08.2021 rendered in WPC (OAC) No.1629 of 2015, whereby and whereunder allowing writ petition invoking power under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India a learned Single Judge of this Court held that the respondent No.1 had requisite qualification of Bachelor of Education from University recognized by the National Council for Teacher Education having affiliation of the Utkal University, as such is entitled to be considered for engagement as Contract Teacher (Hindi), the appellants, functionaries of the State Government preferred the present intra-Court appeal.
THE FACTS:
2. As it appears from the material on record of the writ petition, submitting application in pursuance of Resolution bearing No. VIII(B)SME-(X)-32/2014- 23404/SME, dated 27.10.2014 of the Government of Orissa in School and Mass Education Department for 'Recruitment Procedure of Teaching Staff in Government Secondary Schools' treating it to be advertisement, the respondent No.l-writ petitioner offered his candidature in respect of Contract Teacher (Hindi) in Government Secondary School, giving preference of five districts, such as, (i) Jajpur, (ii) Jagatsinghpur, (Hi) Ganjam, (iv) Balasore and (v) Angul.
2.1. By filing counter, the Director of Secondary Education asserted that an advertisement was published on 27.10.2014 inviting applications for filling up of 5634 numbers of posts of Contract Teachers in Government High Schools throughout the State of Odisha.
2.2. In this writ appeal it has been averred by the appellants that though the last date for receiving application from the intending candidates was fixed to 20.11.2014, after submission of such application by the respondent No.l, a corrigendum was issued to the said advertisement, extending the last date for receiving the application up to 28.01.2015. Accordingly, after due verification of documents a check list was issued by the verifying authority on 16.03.2015 and thereafter, provisional tabulation sheet of candidates was published from the Office of the Director of Secondary Education, where the name of the respondent No.l did find place at Sl. No.203.
2.3. Later on, upon verification, it is stated by the appellants that citing 'not having requisite qualification', the name of Respondent No.l was placed at Sl. No. 535, in the list of rejected candidates of Contract Teacher (Hindi) published.
2.4. Dissatisfied thereby, the Respondent No.l had approached the learned Orissa Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack by way of filing Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, which was registered as O.A No.1629 (C) of 2015 with prayer inter alia 'to declare that B.Ed. from Jammu University with Hindi as one of the subjects and mediums of examination in Hindi as the requisite qualification for Hindi Teacher as required by the State Government and the petitioner be made eligible to remain in draft select list'.
2.5. Record of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal reveals that vide Order No.04, dated 13.05.2015, while issuing notice on admission, the following interim Order was passed:
'***
Issue notice on admission ***
So far as prayer for interim relief is concerned application of the applicant may be considered for further processing by respondent Nos.2 and 3 but his candidature shall abide by the result of the O.A.'
2.6. As is stated in the writ appeal by the
Delhi Development Authority Vrs. Durga Chand Kaushish
Yogesh Kumar Vrs. Government of NCT of Delhi
Competition Commission of India Vrs. Steel Authority of India Ltd.
Union of India Vrs. Tulsiram Patel
State of Himachal Pradesh Vrs. Kailash Chand Mahajan
Padma Sundara Rao Vrs. State of T.N.
Radha Sunder Dutta Vrs. Mohd. Jahadur Rahim
Union of India Vrs. Kamlabhai Harjiwandas Parekh
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vrs. Tek Chand Bhatia (1980) 1 SCC 158
Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences Vrs. Bikartan Das
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Vrs. Ram Krishna
A.K. Raghumani Singh Vrs. Gopal Chandra Nath
Banarsi Das Vrs. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Conspectus of Commissioner, Corporation of Madras Vrs. Madras Corporation Teachers' Mandram
Basic Education Board, U.P. Vrs. Upendra Rai
Zahoor Ahmad Rather Vrs. Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad (2019) 2 SCC 404 = (2018) 14 SCR 1082
P.M. Latha Vrs. State of Kerala
The Post Graduate Institute Vrs. Dr. J.B. Dilawari
Union of India Vrs. Mohan Lal Capoor
Union of India Vrs. Bikash Kuanar
Sadananda Halo Vrs. Momtaz Ali Sheikh
University of Mysore Vrs. C.D. Govinda Rao
Union of India Vrs. Arulmozhi Iniarasu
Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. Vrs. N.R. Vairamani
Bhuwalka Steel Industries Limited Vrs. Bombay Iron & Steel Labour Board
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited Vrs. Mahendra Prasad Jakhmola
Swami Krishnanand Govindananad Vrs. Managing Director, Oswal Hosiery (Regd.)
C.M. Arumugam Vrs. S. RajgopaV
State authorities have broad discretion to set educational qualifications for public service positions, and courts will not interfere unless there are statutory violations.
Employment and Service matter - Post of contractual Hindi Teacher - Petitioner has got the basic qualification and training qualification along with B.Ed. from Jammu University, his application shoul....
The Sastri qualification is legally equivalent to a Bachelor’s Degree, satisfying the educational requirements for the appointment of a Hindi Teacher (Contractual).
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of fair play and non-discrimination principles in service jurisprudence, emphasizing equal treatment for similarly situated employe....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the qualifications required for appointment as a trained Teacher in Secondary School do not necessarily mandate a specific graduation subject,....
The main legal point established is that for the appointment of a teacher in a specific subject, a specialized degree in that subject, not a subsidiary one, is required as per the advertisement stipu....
Higher qualification like B.Ed. (Special Education) not equivalent to prescribed 2-year Diploma unless expressly declared; eligibility strictly per Recruitment Rules as on cut-off date; courts cannot....
The court upheld the validity of the Respondent's appointment as Hindi Teacher, affirming that qualifications including 'Rashtrabhasha Shastri' are equivalent to Bachelor's Degree and emphasizing res....
There is no equivalent Rule akin to Rule 10(a)(ii). A perusal of the said Rule 10(a)(ii) clearly presupposes and provides that the acquisition of a higher qualification would presuppose the acquisiti....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.