SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 968

ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.
Manoranjan Behera – Petitioner
Versus
State of Odisha & Others - Opposite Parties
WP(C) No.17618 of 2025
Decided On : 26-08-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Bijaya Kumar Behera-1, Adv.
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Gyanalok Mohanty, S.C.

The District Level Valuation Committee lacks authority to enhance property valuations by percentage; it may only fix benchmark values according to statutory provisions, thus quashing improper enhancements is justified.

Headnote:(A) The Odisha Stamp Rules, 1952 - Rules 37, 40 and 41 - Constitution and powers of District Level and Sub-District Valuation Committees - Enhancement of Bench Mark Valuation beyond statutory provisions by District Level Valuation Committee (DLVC) quashed for non-compliance with established procedures and lack of authority to act via percentage increase. (Paras 5, 9, 10, 18)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - Maintainability - A writ under Article 226 can be filed for the enforcement of statutory or legal rights, specifically in cases of breach of statutory duties by public functionaries. (Paras 12, 16)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner challenges the validity of DLVC's enhancement of immovable property valuations, claiming it exceeds the allowable parameters set out in the Odisha Stamp Rules, arguing failure to follow the required procedures.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the DLVC's actions were in violation of statutory provisions, necessitating the quashing of the enhanced valuations and ordering compliance with proper procedures.

Issues: The primary issues included whether the DLVC had the authority to enhance property valuations through percentage rather than fixation and if the statutory procedures were properly followed.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the DLVC cannot enhance valuations but only fix them as per statutory guidelines, thus holding that the actions taken were invalid and procedurally flawed.

Result: Writ petition allowed; Annexures 3 and 4 quashed.

Table of Content
1. hearing and arguments from both parties. (Para 2 , 3)
2. procedural rules on valuation committees. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. improper enhancement of valuation. (Para 8 , 10)
4. authority must follow statutory procedures. (Para 9 , 11 , 12)
5. quashing of annexures and directive to follow law. (Para 13 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT :

A.C. Behera, J.

This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the Petitioner praying for quashing the Annexure-3 (District Level Valuation Committee), Ganjam dated 27.01.2022 and Annexure-4 (Sub- Divisional Valuation Committee) dated 16.01.2024 on the ground that, the same are not in accordance with law.

2. I have already heard from the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the Opposite Parties.

3. During the course of hearing, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that, when the District Level Valuation Committee (DLVC), Ganjam as per its resolution dated 27.01.2022 vide Annexure-3 has enhanced the Bench Mark Valuation of the immovable properties in different areas of Ganjam District under different Sub-Divisions and Tahasils to the exorbitant percentages much more than 100 per cent without application of the minds of the members of the DLVC, and without following the due procedures of law, the same are liable to be quashed.

To which, the learned Standing Counsel objected contending that, Annexure-3 has been prepared by the members of the District Level Valuation Committee (DLVC), Ganjam as per law on the basis of the resolution of the Sub-Divisional Valuation Committee (SDVC) vide Annexure-4, for which, neither Annexure-3 nor Annexure-4 is liable to be quashed.

4. Rule 37 of The Odisha Stamp Rules, 1952 provides about the constitution of District Level Committee and Sub-District (Tahasil Level) Valuation Committee and also about its Chairman and Members.

As per the said Rule 37 of The Odisha Stamp Rules, 1952, the Chairman of the District Level Valuation Committee (DLVC) is Collector. The Chairman-cum-Collector of the DLVC shall nominate two public persons, as the nominees and one of the nominees of the Chairman be preferably an expert valuer or an expert familiar with principles and practices of valuation of land, buildings and other immovable properties and the tenure of such nominated members shall be two years.

Rule 37 -A of the said Rules provides that, the District Valuation Committee may utilize the services of professional life chartered values for assisting in revision of market value guideline.

Rules 38 and 39 of The Odisha Stamp Rules, 1952 provide about functions to be performed by the District Valuation Committee and Sub-District Valuation Committee.

Rule 40 of The Odisha Stamp Rules, 1952 provides that, the market value guidelines prepared under the chapter shall be issued as soon as they are prepared and shall thereafter be revised biennially from the 1st April. But, in case, the Committee fails to revise the valuation, the Collector as Chairman would enhance the value by ten per cent (10%) of the value so fixed. Rule 41 of The Odisha Stamp Rules, 1952 provides about the procedure for preparation of set of market value. As per Rule 41, while working out the values of immovable properties, the respective Committee shall take into account the principle of valuation mentioned in clause (a) of Rule 39 and Appendix II and such other instructions issued by the Government and Inspector General of Registration from time to time.

Rule 41-A of The Odisha Stamp Rules, 1952 provides that, notwithstanding contained anything in these rules under this chapter, the State Government may engage reputed professional agency to examine the procedure for fixation of market value guideline regarding proper value of the properties in any particular area or areas under such terms and conditions as considered proper for being taken into consideration by the Committee for such area/areas.

Rule 42 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top