Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K.SAHOO, CHITTARANJAN DASH
Sunita Mundari – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accusations against sunita mundari for murder. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. witness statements supporting prosecution case. (Para 4) |
| 3. defense denies guilt. (Para 5) |
| 4. arguments presented by defense and prosecution. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. need for thorough examination of circumstantial evidence. (Para 8) |
| 6. critical view on evidence and implications. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. conclusion against conviction of appellant. (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT :
S.K. SAHOO, J.
1. The appellant Sunita Mundari faced trial in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rourkela in Sessions Trial No.132 of 2011 for commission of offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter “I.P.C.”) on the accusation that on 27/28.06.2011 in village Jhirpani, she committed murder by intentionally causing the death of her husband Mangal Mundari (hereinafter “the deceased”).
The learned trial Court vide impugned judgment and order dated 20.12.2012 has been pleased to hold the appellant guilty of the offence charged and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life.
Prosecution Case:
2. The prosecution case, as per the first information report (hereinafter “F.I.R.”) (Ext.3) presented by L
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
