IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ARINDAM SINHA, M.S.SAHOO
Amarendra Samal – Appellant
Versus
Sunita Das @ Samal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed against family court judgment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. grounds for mental cruelty established. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. false allegations constitute mental cruelty. (Para 7) |
| 4. divorce granted on grounds of cruelty. (Para 8) |
| 5. appeal allowed and disposed of. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Mr. Chakravarty, learned advocate appears on behalf of appellant-husband and submits, the appeal be heard. His client is aggrieved by judgment dated 7th February, 2023 of the Family Court dismissing his petition for dissolution of the marriage, while directing Rs.10,000/- per month as maintenance for respondent-wife and Rs.4,000/- per month for the minor son.
“2. We reproduce below the direction from said order dated 2nd April, 2024.
Registrar Civil Court, Balasore has by letter dated 22nd April, 2024 said there was due service. We find the learned advocate served had made endorsement in acknowledging receipt on 22nd April, 2024. We reproduce below the endorsement.
… … …”
4. He relies on judgment of the Supreme Court in K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa , reported in AIR (2013) SC 2176, paragraph 14, reproduced below.
(emphasis supplied)
5. He then relies on Narendra v. K. Meena , reported in (20
Unsubstantiated allegations and threats of suicide constitute mental cruelty, justifying the dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Marriage Act.
False allegations made in legal proceedings can constitute mental cruelty, warranting divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Mental cruelty as a ground for divorce requires clear and convincing evidence; mere allegations without substantiation do not meet the legal threshold for dissolution of marriage under the Hindu Marr....
The court established that cruelty must entail a series of acts creating an intolerable living situation, rather than isolated incidents, with earlier findings influencing the outcome of divorce peti....
The court found that general allegations of cruelty without specific evidence do not justify the dissolution of marriage, emphasizing the need for substantial proof of mental or physical cruelty.
The main legal point established is that prolonged separation, false accusations, and reluctance for sexual relations can constitute cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Mental cruelty, as defined under Hindu Marriage Act, can irreparably damage the trust and respect in marriage, providing sufficient grounds for divorce even without physical violence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.