Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
K.R.MOHAPATRA, SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Dhruba Charan Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha, represented through – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural background for the amendment of writ petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. consideration of limitation guidelines affecting re-determination of compensation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. invalidation of previous order by l.a. collector due to limitation misunderstanding. (Para 7) |
| 4. remit to l.a. collector for fresh consideration of the case. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT :
I.A. No.1916 of 2026
2. This is an application for amendment of the writ petition.
3.1. Mr. Mishra, learned Additional Standing Counsel does not have any objection to the said prayer for amendment.
3.3. Mr. Routrary, learned counsel for the Petitioners files consolidated writ petition incorporating the proposed amendment in the court today serving copy thereof on the learned counsel for the State.
3.5. Registry is directed to place the consolidated writ petition appropriately in the brief.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
W.P.(C) No. 33633 OF 2025
2. Petitioners in this writ petition seeks to assail the order dated 21st March, 2025 (Annexure-5) passed by the Land Acquisition Collector-cum-Zone Officer, Zone-III, Rengali Right Canal System, Dhenkanal (for brevity, ‘L.A. Collector’), in rejecting an application filed by the Petitio
COVID-19 guidelines allow exclusion of limitation periods when determining the validity of petitions under section 73 of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act.
The Collector must adjudicate claims under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act before referring matters for enhancement, ensuring all procedural requirements are m....
The limitation period for applications under Section 64 of the Act is calculated from the date of the modified award, not the original award.
Acquisition of land – Where no award under Section 11 of Act of 1894 has been made, then, all provisions of new Act of 2013 relating to determination of compensation would apply.
The limitation period for seeking redetermination of compensation under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act begins from the date of the original court's award, not from appellate decisions.
The period for seeking reference under the Land Acquisition Act runs from the date of knowledge of the award, ensuring fairness in the process.
The delay in approaching the court did not debar the petitioner from seeking remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The demand for justice was compelling, and the court emphasized the....
The effect of interim orders on acquisition proceedings and the entitlement to compensation under the Act of 2013, as influenced by the interpretation of Section 24(1)(a) and the Faizabad Ayodhya Dev....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
