SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 173

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.P.ROUTRAY
Godabari Parida – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : D. Mohapatra
For the Respondent: S.M. Pattanayak

Table of Content
1. claim for compensation due to railway accident (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 7)
2. evidence presented by both parties (Para 5 , 8)
3. importance of evidence over report findings (Para 9 , 10)
4. standards for compensation entitlement (Para 11)
5. outcome: compensation awarded (Para 12)

JUDGMENT :

1. Present appeal by the claimant is directed against the judgment and award dated 27th September 2021 passed by Railway Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench in Case No.OA-IIU/85/2018, wherein the prayer of the Appellant (claimant) for compensation of death of his wife, namely, Goli Parida arising out of Railway accident, has been refused.

3. The case of the claimant is that her wife, namely, Goli Parida while travelling in Berhampur-Bhubaneswar DMU passenger Train No.58412 from Huma to Balugaon Railway Station on 28th January 2018, she accidently fell down at Balugaon Railway Station and died.

5. Admittedly, the claimant has examined himself as AW 1 and two other witnesses as AW 2 and 3 in support of his case. He further adduced the inquest report, postmortem examination report and the identity proof of the deceased before the Tribunal. The respondent- Railways on the other hand examined

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top