SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 286

ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK
BISWANATH RATH, J.
Bholeswari Das – Petitioner
Versus
The Collector & District Magistrate, Nuapada & Anr. – Opp. Parties
W.P.(C) No.8534 of 2023
Decided On : 18-04-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s. P. Acharya, Sr.Adv., S.S. Tripathy & A.B. Pattanaik, Adv.
For the Opp. Parties : Mr. U.K. Sahoo, ASC, M/s. G.B. Singh & A.P.Bose, Adv.

Voter identity card holds greater evidentiary value than school admission records in election disputes regarding age qualification for candidacy.

Headnote:(A) Orissa Gram Panchayat Act, 1964 - Sections 11, 25, and 26 - Disqualification of elected Sarapanch - Petitioner contested election for Sarapanch and was declared disqualified by Collector based on school records. Court ruled that voter ID holds more evidentiary value than school admission records in determining age for candidacy. (Paras 9.A, 10, 13, 17)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner was elected Sarapanch of Sunari Sikuan Gram Panchayat despite a challenge regarding her age based on discrepancies in school records. Opponent asserted she was underage based on student admission records. (Para 1, 2)

Findings of Court:
Collector’s reliance on school records was unjustifiable as age showed by voter identity card was more credible. The decision was deemed beyond the Collector's jurisdiction. The impugned order was set aside, and the Petitioner restored to her position. (Paras 15, 18)

Issues: The court addressed whether the Collector was justified in prioritizing student admission records over the voter identity card in determining the Petitioner’s age for candidacy and if the proceedings were within the Collector's jurisdiction. (Paras 9.A, 11)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the evidentiary superiority of the voter ID over school records, confirmed the narrow jurisdiction under Section 26 focusing on disqualification, and pointed out the misapplication of law by the Collector. (Paras 10, 13, 17)

Result: Writ Petition succeeds; impugned order set aside, and Petitioner is restored to her position as Sarapanch.

Table of Content
1. writ petition background and electoral process details (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments on the grounds of disqualification (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8)
3. court's analysis on evidence standards (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. decision on collector's jurisdiction and power (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
5. outcome of the appeal and restoration of position (Para 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT :

BISWANATH RATH, J.

1. This is a Writ Petition at the instance of the returned candidate, Petitioner herein, for the post of Sarapanch of Sunari Sikuan Gram Panchayat in challenge to the impugned order at Annexure-12 passed by the Collector & District Magistrate, Nuapada in exercise of power under Section 26 of the ORISSA GRAM PANCHAYAT ACT , 1964 (herein after called, O.G.P. Act) in allowing the Section 26 Application at the instance of the unsuccessful candidate, O.P.2 herein seeking declaring the returned candidate to be disqualified to hold the post of Sarapanch.

2. Factual background as revealed, the Petitioner along with O.P.2 and two others contested for the post of Sarapanch of Sunari Sikuan Gram Panchayat of Khariar Panchayat Samiti of Nuapada District in the General Elections to Panchayati Raj Institutions, 2022. Nomination papers of all these persons were duly accepted by the Election Officer after proper scrutiny, vide the Election Notification at Annexure-1. Annexure-2 is a disclosure of candidates to the post of Sarapanch of different Gram Panchayats in Khariar Panchayat Samiti. In the election the Petitioner having secured highest number of votes was elected as the Sarapanch of Sunari Sikuan Gram Panchayat. On 2.3.2022 the Election Officer notified the name of the Petitioner being duly elected as Sarapanch, vide Annexure-3.It is while the Petitioner was in charge of Sarapanch of Sunari Sikuan Gram Panchayat, she received notice dated 28.3.2022 appearing to be in connection with the proceeding under Section 26 of the O.G.P.Act on the File of the Collector & District Magistrate, Nuapada, as Application being moved by O.P.2 to remove the Petitioner from the post of Sarapanch on the footing that she had not attended 21 years of age as on date of filing of nomination. It appears, the complain before the Collector & District Magistrate was based on the Student Admission Register of the Petitioner while she was a student of Odisha Adarsha Vidyalaya, Badi and High School Certificate. This case was registered as Misc. Case No.4/2022 on the File of O.P.1. Notice is appended as Annexure-4. The Petitioner on her appearance filed a detailed show cause along with supporting documents, such as Voter Identity Card, Voter List, Aadhar Card, Pan Card, Medical Certificate issued by the Medical Officer in-charge of Khariar C.H.C., Birth Register of the Anganwadi Worker of Sunari Sikuan A.W.C. 4. The Petitioner in the show cause attempted to support all the above documents in order to establish that she had already attended 21 years of age at the time of filing of nomination paper for the post of Sarapanch. Copy of the show cause reply is appended here as Annexure-5 and copies of the documents indicated herein above introduced by the Petitioner herein are all appended as Annexure-6 to 11. There has been involvement of an enquiry in the Section 26 proceeding. On completion of argument, O.P.1 passed order dated 15.3.2023 in Misc. Case No.4/2022 at Annexure-12 declaring the Petitioner disqualified to contest the post of Sarapanch and as a consequence, there was also direction for removal of her from the post of Sarapanch.

3. The Petitioner assailed the impugned order on the following grounds :-

9.A. Though the Petitioner adduced sufficient material evidences such as voter id card, voter list, Aadhar card, Pan card, medical certificate issued by the medical officer in charge of Khariar CHC, birth register of the Anganwadi worker of Sunariskuan AWC 4 to prove her age, the same was conveniently ignored by the Opp.Party no.1, without assigning any reason thereto. The Petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top