Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
T. Nagin Kumar Senapati – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of writ petition seeking quash. (Para 1) |
| 2. argument regarding procedural deficiency in suspension. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. state’s defense on licensing authority's compliance. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's view on authority's discretion and compliance. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. conclusion regarding the infructuous proceeding. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. direction for renewal process of license. (Para 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT :
1.This writ petition has been preferred with a prayer to quash the order of suspension dated 06.08.2015 as at Annexure-3, vide which the Opposite Party No.2 (Collector, Ganjam) ordered to suspend the wholesale kerosene license of the Petitioner. A further prayer has been made to pass an order directing the authority concern to allow the Petitioner to continue as kerosene wholesale dealer in his place of business at Rambha.
3. Mr. Patra, learned Counsel for the Petitioner drawing attention of this Court to the impugned order dated 06.08.2015 as at Annexure-3 submits, in terms of Clause-14 (3) of the Odisha Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2008, shortly, “Control Order, 2008”, even though a proceeding is initiated against the dealer in terms of Cl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
