Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.K.MOHAPATRA
Prasant Kumar Patnaik – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed for pension due to retirement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background of petitioner's service and pending cases. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. petitioner previously requested pension consideration. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. legal grounds on withholding pension. (Para 15 , 16 , 19) |
| 5. entitlement to pension despite audit issues. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 6. court orders pension payment with interest. (Para 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The above named Petitioner, who is a retired Government employee, has filed the present writ petition questioning the validity and propriety of order dated 13.10.2023 passed by the Opposite Party No.1 thereby rejecting the representation of the Petitioner dated 18.05.2023 and 03.08.2023 filed with a prayer for sanction and disbursement of final pension, gratuity and unutilized leave salary along with interest @ 18% from the date of retirement of the Petitioner. The Petitioner while praying for quashing of order dated 13.10.2023 under Annexure-8 to the writ petition has also prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus thereby directing the Opposite Party No.1 to sanction and disburse the final pension and gratuity as is due and admissible to the Petitioner along with interest
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
