Back
THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
E. Swarnalata @ P. Swarnalata – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha (Vigilance) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's husband is principal accused. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding prior court proceedings. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. analysis of abetment under ipc. (Para 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 4. role of non-public servants in prosecution. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. criminal proceedings quashed against petitioner. (Para 10 , 11) |
Judgment :
1. The husband of the petitioner being the principal accused and the petitioner are facing prosecution in Disproportionate Assets case arising out of the F.I.R. in Berhampur Vigilance P.S. Case No.45 of 2016 corresponding to GR (V) Case No.33/2016(v) for the offences under Sections-13(2)/13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act r/w Section- 109 IPC pending in the Court of the learned Special Judge, Vigilance, Berhampur. The petitioner is seeking quashing of the criminal proceeding initiated against her under the aid of Section-109 .
3. Mr. Maharana, learned counsel for the opposite party submits that the principal accused had approached this Court by filing of CRLMC No. 687 of 2021 seeking quashing of the entire proceeding against him. After the removal of the properties counted towards his disproportionate assets belongs to his father. The coordinate Bench of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
