Back
M. NIRMAL KUMAR
M. Thangavel – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Chennai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgement details and factual background. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by the defendants regarding assets. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. defense arguments focusing on the cbi's handling of facts. (Para 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. observations regarding the prosecution's charge and trial fairness. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. criteria for establishing disproportionate assets and public servants' rights. (Para 21 , 22 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. framework for assessing joint liabilities in prosecuting allegations of corruption. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 30) |
| 7. final decision affirming trial court ruling and dismissing petitions. (Para 34 , 35) |
JUDGMENT
(Common Prayer: Criminal Revision Petitions filed under Sections 397 r/w. 401 of CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE , to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No/2564 of 2020, Cr.M.P.No.6927 of 2019 and Cr.M.P.No.7326 of 2018 in C.C.No.10 of 2018 dated 07.02.2022 passed by learned Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, VIII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai and discharge the petitioners.)
Common Order:
1. The petitioners M.Thangavel/A1, P.Vijayalakshmi/A2 and M.Marichamy/A3 in C.C.No.10 of 2018 pending on the file of the learned Principal Special Judge for CBI Case
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
