Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K.SAHOO
Sandeep Kumar Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1) |
| 2. details of the prosecution case. (Para 2) |
| 3. witness testimonies and evidence presented. (Para 3) |
| 4. defence plea and counter testimony. (Para 4) |
| 5. trial court findings and reliance on evidence. (Para 5) |
| 6. arguments from the appellant's counsel. (Para 6) |
| 7. analysis of section 394 of ipc. (Para 7) |
| 8. analysis of section 307 of ipc. (Para 8) |
| 9. analysis of section 27 of the arms act. (Para 9) |
| 10. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The appellant Sandeep Kumar Sahoo in JCRLA No.57 of 2012 and the appellant Deepak Kumar Mangaraj in CRLA No.9 of 2012 faced trial in the Court of learned Assistant Sessions Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puri in Sessions Trial Case No.18/276 of 2010-09 for commission of offences punishable under sections 394/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter ‘I.P.C.’) and sections 25/27 of the Arms Act on the accusation that on 27.06.2009 at about 12.30 p.m. at village Motori near Gatiswar Dev temple, they attempted to commit robbery of Rs.30,000/- (rupees thirty thousand) from Subash Chandra Senapati (P.W.5) and also attempted to commit murder of P.W.5 by firing pistol in furthe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
