Sailesh Muduli @ Sailesh Kumar vs State of Orissa

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SAVITRI RATHO
Sailesh Muduli @ Sailesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :R.N. Rout, Advocate
For the Respondent: S.S. Pradhan, A.G.A.

Table of Content
1. seizure of vehicle due to alleged illicit liquor activities. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. petitioner's request for vehicle release denied based on confiscation proceedings. (Para 5 , 6)
3. clarification of legal provisions regarding confiscation and interim release. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. issues regarding initiation and status of confiscation proceedings. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. court allows interim release considering vehicle's deteriorating condition. (Para 13 , 14)

ORDER :

2. I have heard Mr. R.N. Rout, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sibani Shankar Pradhan, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate for the State through hybrid mode.

4. The prosecution allegations in brief are that on receipt of information that one Sailendra Muduli was procuring ID liquor and adulterating it at his house in ward No 10 , Karanjia and thereafter delivering it to various street sellers and at the relevant time was coming in Indigo CS Car LX TCIC bearing registration No. OR-02- BF-2992 with such liquor , on 19.12.2019 the vehicle was detained and was found to be driven by Sailendra Muduli loaded with about 100 litres of liquor kept in a big black tube concealed under a bag without any supporting docum

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACKSAVITRI RATHOSailesh Muduli @ Sailesh Kumar – AppellantVersusState of Orissa – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SAVITRI RATHO
Sailesh Muduli @ Sailesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent