SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.K.MOHAPATRA
Basudev Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : B.K. Swain
For the Respondent: K.K. Nayak

Table of Content
1. factual background of seizure and arrest. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's analysis on vehicle seizure and release. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
3. arguments regarding release and ownership. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. judgment allowing interim release of the vehicle. (Para 35)
5. final judgment and directions for interim release. (Para 36)

JUDGMENT :

1. The present criminal revision petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Section 401 Cr.P.C. challenging the order dated 28.12.2021 passed by the learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Phulbani, in Crl. Misc. Case No.27 of 2021, which arises out of C.T. Case No.11 of 2020, corresponding to Phiringia P.S. Case No.13 of 2020, thereby rejecting the petition under Section 457 of Cr.P.C. filed by the Petitioner to release the vehicle bearing RegistrationNo.OD-24-7214 (Swift Dezire Car).

3. While the matter stood thus, the Petitioner filed a petition under Section 457 Cr.P.C. bearing Crl. Misc. Case No.16 of 2021 before the trial court for release of his vehicle (Swift Dezire Car) bearing No.OD-24-7214 on the ground

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top