SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CHITTARANJAN DASH
D.Rama Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. P.K.Mishra, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mrs. S. Patnaik, AGA

Table of Content
1. allegations of dowry demand and cruelty (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. defense arguments against prosecution (Para 5 , 6)
3. court analysis on jurisdiction and offenses (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. dismissal of the application (Para 10)

JUDGMENT :

Chittaranjan Dash, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. By means of this application, the Petitioner seeks to challenge the order of cognizance dated 3rd March, 2016 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Parlakhemundi in G.R. Case No.391 of 2014 for the offences under Sections 498 -A/323/506/406/34 IPC read with Section 4 of the D.P. Act.

3. The background facts of the case are that Smt. Patrakanda Bijaylaxmi, W/o. Patrakanda Ram Prakash of village Kamarda under P.S. Seranga in the district of Gajapati lodged a written report before the IIC, Kasinagar to the effect that he got married to P. Ram Prakash of Kasinagar on 22nd March, 2006 according to Hindu Rites and Customs. Prior to her marriage her husband T. Ram Prakash along with his relatives including the Petitioner, the maternal uncle came to the house of the informant and demanded dowry and the same was upon negotiation was finalized.

However, it is alleged in the report that the parent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top