IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CHITTARANJAN DASH
D.Rama Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of dowry demand and cruelty (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defense arguments against prosecution (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court analysis on jurisdiction and offenses (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. dismissal of the application (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT :
Chittaranjan Dash, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. By means of this application, the Petitioner seeks to challenge the order of cognizance dated 3rd March, 2016 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Parlakhemundi in G.R. Case No.391 of 2014 for the offences under Sections 498 -A/323/506/406/34 IPC read with Section 4 of the D.P. Act.
3. The background facts of the case are that Smt. Patrakanda Bijaylaxmi, W/o. Patrakanda Ram Prakash of village Kamarda under P.S. Seranga in the district of Gajapati lodged a written report before the IIC, Kasinagar to the effect that he got married to P. Ram Prakash of Kasinagar on 22nd March, 2006 according to Hindu Rites and Customs. Prior to her marriage her husband T. Ram Prakash along with his relatives including the Petitioner, the maternal uncle came to the house of the informant and demanded dowry and the same was upon negotiation was finalized.
However, it is alleged in the report that the parent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.