SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ori) 231

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
R.K.PATTANAIK
Durga Sankar Behera – Appellant
Versus
Pallisri Mahila Samiti – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. D.R. Mohapatra, Advocate

Table of Content
1. factual background of adoption case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments challenging the refusal of adoption (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
3. discussion on adoption regulations and eligibility (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. court's concern for child's welfare (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
5. extraordinary jurisdiction invoked for child's interest (Para 17 , 18)
6. final decision permitting adoption (Para 19 , 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT :

1. Instant revision in terms of Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) is at the behest of the petitioners assailing the correctness, legality and judicial propriety of the impugned order dated 19th December, 2017 under Annexure-1 passed in connection with C.M.A. No.39 of 2017 by the learned District Judge, Kendrapara, whereby, an application under Section 58 (3) thereof filed by them and the opposite party seeking adoption order of a minor child was dismissed on the grounds inter alia that the same is not sustainable in law and therefore, deserves to be interfered with and set aside in the interest of justice.

3. The petitioners are related as husband and wife and permanent resident of Kendrapa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top