AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Richa Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sandeep Moudgil, J. - The jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was invoked by the petitioner for the issuance of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus for the release of her son, Advait Gupta, who was stated to be in illegal and unlawful custody of respondents No.5 to 9, specifically respondent No.7-Minakshi Gupta, who claims to have legally adopted the child, with the consent of her husband, Sai Kiran (who is not party to the lis).
2. Before adverting to the legal question involved in the instant petition, facts in brief as have been unfolded before this Court are that the marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with Adesh Gupta on 27.05.2017 and out of the said wedlock, one son, namely, Advait Gupta was born on 01.06.2019. The husband of the petitioner unfortunately, expired on 22.07.2019 and thereafter, as per averments made in the petition, having been treated with disrespect and meted out with harassment, was forced to leave the matrimonial home, by respondents No.5 & 6 (petitioner's in-laws), leaving behind her son namely Advait Gupta. At that time, the petitioner was introduced, by her in-laws, with respondents No. 8 and 9 (Ashw
L.Debi Prasad (D) by LRs v. Smt. Tribeni Devi
Lakshmi Kant Pandey v. Union of India
Master Param Pal Singh v. M/s National Insurance Company
Mausami Moltra Ganguli v. Jayant Ganguli
Mrs. Elizabeth Dinshaw v. Arvand M. Dinshaw
R.K. v. Central Adoption Resource Authority, decided on 31.08.2021, WP(C) 279 of 2019
Shabnam Hashmi v. Union of India
Shabnam Hashmi v. Union of India
Shilpa Aggarwal v. Aviral Mittal
Sivarama K. v. State Of Kerala
Smt. Surinder Kaur Sandhu v. Harbax Singh Sandhu
Anokha v. The State of Rajasthan
Ghisalal v. Dhapubai (Dead) by Lrs.
Jasmine Kaur v. Union of India, 2020(3) RCR(Civ) 528, CWP No.10555 of 2019
Adoption - Applicability of JJ Act, 2015 - Adoption of child can be undertaken under the provisions of the JJ Act, 2015, only if the child is either in conflict with law or in need of care and protec....
Inter-country adoptions under HAMA require a No Objection Certificate from CARA, and the Juvenile Justice Act does not apply to such direct adoptions, creating a need for procedural clarity.
The Juvenile Justice Act does not cover adoption procedures for foreign citizens, emphasizing the necessity of local law compliance for such adoptions.
Scope of Juvenile Justice Act, and inapplicability of the same to the adoptions made under the HAMA Act were noticed and elaborately dealt by a Division Bench of Kerala High Court and the Punjab and ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the validity and legality of adoptions claimed under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, and the inapplicability of the Juvenile Justice ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the adoption process for Inter-Country Adoption must comply with the Hague Convention and the Regulations for Inter-Country Adoption, and the ....
The biological father's consent is not required for the adoption of a child born from sexual assault when the mother is a minor, prioritizing the child's welfare and the mother's status as the natura....
Post-2022 HAMA relative adoption by parents with foreign citizenship treated as expatriate: District Magistrate verifies under Reg 69, Authority issues NOC under Reg 70 without receiving country prio....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.