SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 736

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SAVITRI RATHO
Sonalija Jena – Appellant
Versus
Abinash Mohapatra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : B. Parida
For the Respondent: R. Prusty

Table of Content
1. transfer of cases under the c.p.c. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of marriage and petitioner’s grievances. (Para 3)
3. opposition to transfer based on inconvenience. (Para 4)
4. explaining the provisions for transfer of cases. (Para 5 , 6)
5. balancing convenience of both parties. (Para 7 , 8)
6. conclusion: allowing the transfer for justice. (Para 9 , 10)
7. directions for compliance and urgency. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)

ORDER :

TRP(C) No. 235 of 2022 has been filed by the petitioner-wife under Section 24 of C.P.C. for transfer of C.P. No. 128 of 2022 filed by the opp. party-husband under Section 25 of the Guardian & Wards Act 1890, in the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Rourkela, to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar, which is listed today along with this TRP(C) and is also disposed of today by a separate order.

3. Mr. B. Parida, learned counsel for the petitioner- wife submits that the parties had fallen in love and their marriage was arranged and solemnized before friends and relatives in the Rourkela Club on 10.02.2012. The parents of the petitioner had fulfilled the demands made at the time of marriage. But soon after her marriage she was torture

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top