SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ori) 303

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
K.R.MOHAPATRA
Manoj Dash – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Dayananda Mohapatra
For the Respondent: Swayambhu Mishra

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek to challenge refusal of sale deed registration. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments for legality of registration despite ongoing settlement. (Para 3)
3. no restriction on property alienation during settlement. (Para 4)
4. instructions clarify registration process under law. (Para 5)
5. court finds impugned orders unsustainable. (Para 6)
6. court orders resubmission for registration consideration. (Para 7)

ORDER :

2. The Petitioners in this writ petition seek to assail the refusal order Nos.1408 and 1409 dated 4th November, 2023 (Annexures-4 and 5) respectively passed by the Registering Officer, Khandagiri, Bhubaneswar.

3.1. Mr. Mohapatra, learned counsel further submits that there is no restriction under Section 22 -A of the Registration Act, 1908 to refuse the registration of the sale deeds on the ground of continuance of settlement operation. However, the Registering Officer, Khandagiri refused to register the sale deeds on flimsy grounds under Annexures-4 and 5. He also relied upon the decision in the case of Ranjan Kumar Routray v. State of Odisha and others, 2023 (I) OLR 672, wherein this Court held as under:

The said position as taken by the State is quite un

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top