SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ori) 311

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK


Table of Content
1. conviction details and background (Para 1 , 2)
2. discrepancies in victim's testimony (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's analysis of evidence (Para 5 , 6)
4. appeal outcome and order (Para 7)

JUDGMENT :

1. The Appellant, by filing this Appeal, has assailed the judgment of conviction and order of sentence 4th March 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jagatsinghpur in Criminal Trial Case 48 of 2008 arising out of G.R. Case No.368 of 2004 of the file of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class (J.M.F.C.) (P), Kujanga.

2. The prosecution case is that on 02.08.2004 around 9 pm, the victim (P.W.11) then aged about 15 years had gone outside and this accused took her away in a car to distant place. A report to the above effect being lodged by the father of the victim (P.W.6), the same was treated as F.I.R. and case being registered, investigation commenced. On completion of investigation, this accused and other two others faced trial for commission of offence under section-366/376/109/34 of the IPC. The Trial Court has finally convicted this accused for commission of offence under section-376 of the IPC and accordingly, the accused has been sentenced as aforesaid, when o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top