Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Nayagarah Sugar Complex Limited, Represented Through Its Chairman Sri Trailokya Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Sub-Registrar, Nayagarh, District-Nayagarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. counsel heard from both parties. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner presented sale deeds for registration. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. sub-registrar must provide reasons for refusal. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. writ petition allowed; sub-registrar to act. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT :
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.
1. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner-company and the learned SC for the State.
2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that, petitioner had presented three sale deeds before the Sub-Registrar, Nayagarh (Opp. Party) fulfilling all the criterias/conditions of the Registration Act, 1908 and Rules thereof for registration of the said sale deeds, but the Sub-Registrar, Nayagarh (Opp. Party) refused to receive the said three sale deeds and returned back that sale deeds to the petitioner without passing any order regarding the refusal for Registration of the same.
For which, the petitioner submitted a representation before sale deeds, but, that representation of the petitioner has not been considered by the Sub-Registrar, Nayagarh (Opp. Party) as yet.
3. So, without getting any way, the petitioner filed this writ petition for necessary order as per law for registration of the sale deeds, thos
The Sub-Registrar must register the documents or provide a reasoned order for refusal under the Indian Registration Act, 1908.
The Sub-Registrar must register deeds without oral refusals unless legal defects exist; title disputes are to be handled by civil courts.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
