Nayagarah Sugar Complex Limited, Represented Through Its Chairman Sri Trailokya Mishra vs Sub-Registrar, Nayagarh, District-Nayagarh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Ori) 1105

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Nayagarah Sugar Complex Limited, Represented Through Its Chairman Sri Trailokya Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Sub-Registrar, Nayagarh, District-Nayagarh – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Subhendu Kar, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. G. Mohanty, Standing Counsel

Table of Content
1. counsel heard from both parties. (Para 1)
2. petitioner presented sale deeds for registration. (Para 2 , 3)
3. sub-registrar must provide reasons for refusal. (Para 4 , 5)
4. writ petition allowed; sub-registrar to act. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner-company and the learned SC for the State.

For which, the petitioner submitted a representation before sale deeds, but, that representation of the petitioner has not been considered by the Sub-Registrar, Nayagarh (Opp. Party) as yet.

4. On this aspect, the propositions of law has already been clarified in a case between M/s. North East Infrastructure Private Limited & Another Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Others by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in 2025 (2) Civ.C.C. 220 (AP) that,

5. Here in this instant matter at hand, the Sub-Registrar has not accepted the sale deeds presented by the petitioner for registration, for which, by applying propositions of law enunciated in the ratio of the aforesaid decision, it is held that, duties refusing to register the sale deeds without any order for the refusal of registration.

6. Therefore, the writ petition filed by the pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document