SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 466

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ARINDAM SINHA
Dipendri Nag @ Deepandri Nag – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A.K. Acharya
For the Respondent: A.K. Nanda

Table of Content
1. identity not lost by marriage (Para 1 , 2)
2. marriage does not change caste (Para 3 , 6)
3. state contests the petitioner's claim (Para 4 , 5)
4. failure to prove practice of hinduism (Para 7 , 9)
5. court supports authorities' findings (Para 8 , 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT :

1. Mr. Acharya, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, impugned is order dated 23rd March, 2023 passed by the Collector, on appeal preferred against order dated 21st December, 2021 passed by the Tahsildar, refusing to issue caste certificate to his client.

3. He relies on judgment of the Supreme Court in Sunita Singh v. State of U.P. , (2018) 2 SCC 493 , paragraph 5, reproduced below.

He also relies on majority view of said Court in V.V. Giri Vs. D. Suri Dora , AIR 1959 SC 1318 , paragraphs 23 and 24 (SCC online print).

5. The Supreme Court declared the law to be that a person is born into a caste. It cannot be changed by marriage. In other words, being born into an upper caste, one cannot become scheduled caste by marrying a person, who belongs to one. There cannot be any dispute with the proposition. Petitioner’s case is to the contrary. The question is whether she renounced her cas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top