MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
Anandi Panchpal – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief:-
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the recommendation of Scrutiny Committee dated 29.06.2017 as well as the approval dated 4.7.2017 (Annexure-5) given by respondent no. 3.
(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing/commanding the respondents to reinstate the petitioner with all consequential benefits.
3. It is not in dispute that petitioner was married to a person belonging to Scheduled Tribe Community in the year 1989 and, after her marriage, she applied for caste certificate. On 08.02.1990, Tehsildar Bageshwar issued a certificate, declaring that petitioner belongs to Scheduled Tribe Community. On the strength of the caste certificate, petitioner was appointed on 27.07.1996 as Instructor against a post reserved for Scheduled Tribes.
4. In the year 2011, a complaint was made that petitioner does not belong to Scheduled Tribe and ca
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.