SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 490

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Jayashree Biswal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. A. Tripathy, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. S.K. Samal, Aga

Table of Content
1. hybrid arrangement initiation and record keeping. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. delay causing prejudice in the disciplinary proceeding. (Para 4)
3. court's reliance on previous decisions regarding delay. (Para 5)
4. quashing of proceedings due to inordinate delay. (Para 6 , 8)
5. final order on the writ petition. (Para 7 , 9)

ORDER :

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

3. Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition inter alia with the following prayer:-

i) why the Departmental proceeding initiated against the petitioner vide Annexure-1 shall not be quashed for inordinate delay of Fourteen years and

4. It is contended that vide order under Annexure-1 though a proceeding was initiated against the petitioner by the Opposite Party No.2 and the petitioner also filed his written statement of defence on 24.08.2009, but till date the proceeding is yet to be finalized and thereby causing prejudice to the petitioner.

6. Mr. Tripathy, learned counsel for the petitioner accordingly contended that the proceeding is pending since 2009 and the petitioner has no role for non-disposal of the proceeding as on date. The proceeding is therefore liable to be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top