Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BISWAJIT MOHANTY
Bhabani Prasad Majhi – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed to quash appointment order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. opposite parties defend appointment citing pandemic. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. petitioner's locus standi in challenging the order. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. supervision period limit and electoral requirements. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. direction to conduct elections issued. (Para 12) |
| 6. writ petition allowed; cooperative elections directed. (Para 13) |
JUDGMENT :
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with prayer to quash order No.9253 dated 01.05.2020 under Annexure-3 issued by the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Odisha (opposite party No.2) appointing opposite partyNo.3 to manage the affairs of Sundargarh District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. for short, “the Bank” and with a further prayer to direct opposite party Nos.1 to 4 to complete the process of election in respect of Committee of “the Bank” and Primary Agricultural Co-operative Societies affiliated to it in the district of Sundargarh within a stipulate time.
3. The opposite party Nos.1 & 2 have filed their counter affidavit on 08.01.2021 taking stand that the impugned order has been passed properly taking into account the Explanation appended to S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
