SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 884

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU 
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J.
Kamasamudra Vyavasaya Seva Sahakara Sangha Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
The State of Karnataka - Respondent
Writ Petition Nos. 20877, 23569 of 2024
Decided On : 02-05-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : M.R. Rajgopal, H.N. Basavaraju
For the Respondents: Prathima Honnapura, Yogesh D. Naik

The State Government may recommend the appointment of any officer as Administrator of a co-operative society, including senior officers, to facilitate effective elections, provided they have jurisdiction over the society.

Headnote:(A) Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Section 28A(5) - Writ petitions challenging the appointment of an Administrator for a co-operative society after the term of elected members expired - Petitioner argued that the appointment was made without independent application of mind by the Registrar and that a junior officer must be appointed - Court emphasized that the State Government can recommend any officer for appointment as Administrator, including a senior officer, to ensure efficient election management. (Paras 21.1-24.1)

(B) Jurisdiction of Authority - Administrative authority can recommend officers outside the Cooperative department for appointment, as long as they have jurisdiction over the society in question. (Paras 21.2-22.4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner societies, alleging undue delays in elections and improper administration under a newly appointed Administrator, contended that the Regional Commissioner, a senior officer, was improperly appointed over junior officers ineligible for such a role. (Paras 3-12)

Findings of Court:
The appointment of the Regional Commissioner as Administrator was valid, as it complied with statutory provisions and aimed to facilitate free and fair elections amidst ongoing disputes. (Paras 23.1-24.1)

Issues: 1) Authority of State Government to nominate an Administrator; 2) Interpretation of 'any other officer' in the Act; 3) Cadre seniority for Administrator appointment; 4) Validity of the Regional Commissioner's appointment. (Paras 19-21)

Ratio Decidendi: The court clarified that the State Government could appoint senior officers as Administrators and held that the interpretation of statutory provisions allows for broader authority in making such appointments. Malafides not established against the appointed Administrator. (Paras 21.1-24.1)

Result: Writ petitions dismissed, with direction for swift elections. (Paras 24.1)

Table of Content
1. petitioners seeking writ reliefs (Para 1 , 2)
2. facts concerning the election process and appointments of administrators (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. the appointment of an administrator follows the expiry of the elected body. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. petitioners argue lack of independent action by the jrcs (Para 13)
5. jurisdictional arguments and references to cases supporting election rights (Para 14)
6. respondent's arguments defending the appointment of the administrator (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
7. court's analysis and responses to arguments (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
8. dismissal of writ petitions with directive for elections (Para 24)

ORDER :

1. The Petitioner in W.P.No.20877/2024 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

a. Call for records in related to the proceedings bearing No. CO.100CCB2024 dated 29.07.2024;

b. Issue writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the letter dated 29.07.2024 in CO.100CCB2024 issued by the R1 as per Annexure-K and order passed by the R2 Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies dated 30.7.2024 in No. JRB/AA.MAM.RA/28-A(5)/21/2023-24 as per Annexure-L

c. Issue any other appropriate writ or order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and allow this writ petition in the ends of justice and equity.

2. The Petitioner in W.P.No.23569/2024 is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

i. Call for records in related to the proceedings bearing No. CO.100CCB2024 dated 29.07.2024;

ii. Issue writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the letter dated 29.07.2024 in CO.100CCB2024 issued by the R1 as per Annexure-K and order passed by the R2 Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies dated 30.7.2024 in No. JRB/AA.MAM.RA/28-A(5)/21/2023-24 as per Annexure-L

iii. Issue any other appropriate writ or order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and allow this writ petition in the ends of justice and equity.

FACTS IN W.P. No.20877/2024:

3. The Petitioner claims to be a primary society and a member of the Respondent No.4-Kolar and Chikkaballapur Co-operative Bank [hereinafter referred to as ‘DCC Bank’]. The term of the elected body of DCC Bank expired on 17.11.2023; consequent upon the expiry, the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Bangalore District, [hereinafter referred to as ‘DRCS’] appointed an Administrator in terms of Section 28A(5) of the KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT , 1959 [hereinafter referred to as ‘KCS Act’].

4. Elections were required to be held, and a resolution of the Board was passed on 23.03.2023 to that effect. The Board had on 08.05.2023 called for information to provide for a Group-A officer to be appointed as the returning officer. Meanwhile, the term of the Managing Committee expired on 17.11.2023. Prior to such expiry, the Assistant Commissioner, Kolar Sub-division was designated as its returning officer.

5. The process of election being taken up, the preparation of voters list was going on, due to the intervention of the Parliamentary election in the year 2024, the election of all Co-operative societies was postponed by a Government Order dated 06.06.2024.

6. Upon the expiry of the period of postponement, elections were required to be held. However, it is contended that the Administrator appointed in terms of Section 28A(5) was lethargic and did not complete the process of election. Hence, the DCC Bank had approached this court in WP No. 23677 of 2023 and sought for directions to complete the process of election in a time-bound manner. The said writ petition came to be disposed on 03.07.2024 with a direction to the State Co-operation Election Authority, Regional Commissioner, Bangalore Division and the Apex Co-operative Societies Election Officer to continue the process of election in respect of the DCC Bank from the stage it was halted.

7. The District Election Officer was directed to ensure that the process of election s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top