Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SAVITRI RATHO
Prabhati Pattnaik – Appellant
Versus
Aditya Kumar Pattnaik – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction and procedural background (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. transfer request and parties' arguments (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. technology and convenience in judicial proceedings (Para 8 , 9 , 12) |
| 4. decisions on transfer and expediency (Para 10 , 11 , 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
Savitri Ratho, J.
1.This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing mode due to COVID-19 Pandemic.
2. Heard Mr.J.N.Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner-wife and Mr.B.S.Rayaguru, learned counsel for the opp. party-husband.
3. Though this case has been listed along with TRP (C) No. 3 of 2018 filed on behalf of the present petitioner- wife- Smt. Prabhati Pattnaik, on account of non appearance of learned counsel for the opp party –husband-Aditya Kumar Pattnaik in that case , the same is adjourned on the request of Mr B. S Rayaguru , learned counsel who is appearing for the Opp party-husband in the present TRP( C ) .
4. In this petition, the petitioner-wife has prayed for a direction to transfer the Civil Proceeding No.54 of 2017 pending before the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Bhawanipatna to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Berhampur.
5. Mr. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner-wife
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
