Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.K.MOHAPATRA
Suraj Kumar Mallick – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural context and recognition of petitioner. (Para 1 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. factual grounding for the petitioner's claim. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. claims regarding merit and process irregularities. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. principles against discrimination in similar cases. (Para 6 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. defenses regarding recruitment authority. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. conclusion allowing petition and ordering reconsideration. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. U.K. Samal, learned counsel along with Mr. S. Patra, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner as well as Mr. P.C. Das, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State-Opposite Party and Mr. P.K. Mohanty, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the O.P.S.C.-O.P. No.2. Perused the pleadings of the parties as well as documents annexed thereto.
3. The factual background leading to filing the present case, in short, is that, on 17.04.2015 the OPSC published an advertisement for recruitment to the post of Assistant Executive Engineer (Civil). The total posts that were advertised to be filled up are 657 out of which 74 posts were reserved for SEBC category. The petitioner submitted his candidature under the SEBC (M) category on 30.08.2015. Pursuant to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
