Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.K.MOHAPATRA
Suraj Kumar Mallick – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural context and recognition of petitioner. (Para 1 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. factual grounding for the petitioner's claim. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. claims regarding merit and process irregularities. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. principles against discrimination in similar cases. (Para 6 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. defenses regarding recruitment authority. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. conclusion allowing petition and ordering reconsideration. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT :
A.K. Mohapatra, J.
1. Heard Mr. U.K. Samal, learned counsel along with Mr. S. Patra, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner as well as Mr. P.C. Das, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State-Opposite Party and Mr. P.K. Mohanty, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the O.P.S.C.-O.P. No.2. Perused the pleadings of the parties as well as documents annexed thereto.
2. By filing the present writ application the Petitioner seeks for quashing of office Order No.7000/PSC dtd.21.12.2020 under Annexure-7 with a further direction to the Opposite Parties to convene a Special Board to conduct the viva-voce test of the petitioner as has been done in the case of Ajit Kumar Pradhan, the applicant in O.A. No.1129(C) of 2016 and thereafter to recommend the case of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
