Back
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK
B.R.SARANGI
Bidyut Manjari Sethi – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis of the petitioner's claim. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contentions regarding eligibility and jurisdiction. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's evaluation of candidates' eligibility. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal standards for issuing certiorari. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. court concludes the validity of decisions handed down by the sub-collector. (Para 16) |
| 6. final judgment to dismiss the writ petition. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT :
The petitioner, by way of this writ petition, seeks to quash order dated 04.06.2016 at Annexure-15 passed by the Sub-Collector, Puri in AWW Misc. Appeal Case No. 88/2010 and declare that she is entitled to be appointed as Anganwadi Worker in respect of Alipada-2 Anganwadi Centre, as she belonged to ward no. 15 and had secured highest marks, with all consequential benefits.
2.1 Aggrieved by the above selection, the petitioner preferred AWW Misc. Appeal Case No. 88/2010 before the Sub-Collector, Puri. During its pendency, alleging inaction of the authority in disposal of the said appeal, the petitioner filed W.P.(C) No. 8270 of 2010, which was disposed of vide order dated 11.05.2010 directing the Sub- Collector, Puri to decide the grievance of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
