Back
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK
B.R.SARANGI
Bidyut Manjari Sethi – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis of the petitioner's claim. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contentions regarding eligibility and jurisdiction. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's evaluation of candidates' eligibility. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal standards for issuing certiorari. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. court concludes the validity of decisions handed down by the sub-collector. (Para 16) |
| 6. final judgment to dismiss the writ petition. (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT :
B.R. SARANGI, J.
The petitioner, by way of this writ petition, seeks to quash order dated 04.06.2016 at Annexure-15 passed by the Sub-Collector, Puri in AWW Misc. Appeal Case No. 88/2010 and declare that she is entitled to be appointed as Anganwadi Worker in respect of Alipada-2 Anganwadi Centre, as she belonged to ward no. 15 and had secured highest marks, with all consequential benefits.
2. The factual matrix of the case, in hand, is that the Child Development Project Officer (CDPO), Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) Project, Kanas issued an advertisement on 26.03.2010 inviting applications from the eligible candidates for filling up of the post of Anganwadi Worker in additional Anganwadi Centre, namely, Alipada-2 Anganwadi Centre of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
