Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
D.DASH
Sangita @ Sangeeta Behera – Appellant
Versus
Minaketan Behera – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal challenges prior judgment and decrees. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. plaintiff's claimed rights over ancestral property. (Para 3) |
| 3. defendant's claims regarding exclusive property ownership. (Para 4) |
| 4. trial and first appellate court's dismissal reasoning. (Para 5 , 8) |
| 5. no substantial question of law for appeal admission. (Para 6 , 9) |
| 6. final dismissal of the appeal without costs. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT :
The Appellant, by filing this Appeal under Section-100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘the Code’), has assailed the judgment and decree dated 30th August 2022 and 12th September 2022 respectively passed by the learned 1st Additional District Judge, Baripada in R.F.A. No.24 of 2021.
2. For the sake of convenience, in order to avoid confusion and bring in clarity, the parties hereinafter have been referred to, as they have been arraigned in the Trial Court.
4. The Defendant No.1 in his written statement claims to have got the suit land in his share in a partition suit i.e. C.s. No.25 of 1995; wherein the final decree has been passed. He, therefore, claims the suit property to be his separate and exclusive property over which, he denies any sort of claim of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
