SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 560

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
R.K.PATTANAIK
Surendra Patel – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Patel – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : R.K. Mohanty,
For the Respondent: Bhaskar Chandra Panda

Table of Content
1. overview of appeal and original judgment (Para 1 , 2)
2. substantial questions of law formulated (Para 3)
3. court’s confidence in the trial court’s findings (Para 4)
4. contest over adoption and title (Para 5)
5. contested evidence on adoption (Para 6)
6. proof requirements for adoption (Para 7 , 8)
7. issues surrounding the gift deed execution (Para 9)
8. dismissal of appeal and order issued (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT :

1. Instant appeal under Section 100 of the CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE , 1908 is filed by the appellant challenging the impugned judgment dated 6th May, 2008 promulgated in RFA No.13 of 2007 by the learned Additional District Judge, Jharsuguda, whereby, the decision in Civil Suit No.83 of 2005 of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jharsuguda was confirmed for having decreed the suit declaring the right, title and interest in favour of the plaintiff over Schedule ‘A’ property and that defendant No.1 not to be adopted son of the plaintiff on the grounds inter alia that the same is not tenable in law and hence, liable to be set aside in the interest of justice.

3. This Court by order dated 7th January, 2011 taking into account, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top