IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MANASH RANJAN PATHAK, SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
State of Odisha – Appellant
Versus
Bansidhar Bariki – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction of high court in appeals. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background and initiation of proceedings. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. disciplinary proceedings continued despite acquittal. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. relevance of criminal acquittal to disciplinary actions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. standards differences in criminal and disciplinary proceedings. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. linking evidence from both criminal and departmental inquiries. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. final judgment and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 20 , 21) |
Judgment:
The present Writ Appeal arises from the judgment dated 20.11.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.2265 of 2023, whereby the learned Single Judge was pleased to set aside the order of dismissal dated 05.07.2022 passed by the Superintendent of Police, Kandhamal and the appellate order dated 13.12.2022 passed by the Inspector General of Police, Southern Range, Berhampur, and further directed reinstatement of the writ petitioner with all consequential service and financial benefits.
3. The facts of this case, in brief, are that the respondent was serving as a Constable in the Odisha Police establishment. On the basis of an allegation arising out
Nelson Motis vs. Union of India
Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C vs. Mohd. Yusuf Miya
Ajit Kumar Nag vs. General Manager (PJ), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Acquittal in criminal proceedings impacts related departmental inquiries; due process violations render disciplinary actions void.
Acquittal in criminal proceedings does not preclude disciplinary actions unless misconduct is independently substantiated; failure to establish such misconduct renders the dismissal legally untenable....
Acquittal in criminal proceedings does not guarantee reinstatement in service due to differing standards of proof in departmental inquiries.
The acquittal in criminal proceedings does not preclude disciplinary action in departmental proceedings, as the standard of proof and burden of proof are different in the two proceedings.
(1) Departmental proceeding is different from a criminal proceeding – Whereas in a departmental proceeding a delinquent employee can be held guilty on the basis of preponderance of probabilities, in ....
The dismissal of a police officer based on departmental proceedings was unjustified as the charges were not proven, and acquittal in criminal proceedings must be considered.
The court held that a disciplinary dismissal based on unproven charges is unjustified, especially when the employee is acquitted in related criminal proceedings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.