Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
V.NARASINGH
Pruthiraj Rana – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
V. Narasingh, J.
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
1. This Criminal Revision has been filed assailing the Judgment dated 08.11.2001 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Boudh in Criminal Appeal No.58 of 2000, affirming the order of conviction qua the Petitioners dated 18.02.2000 passed by the learned J.M.F.C., Boudh in G.R. Case No.441 of 1993 (T.R. Case No.135 of 1998) under Sections 147 /148/323/325 and 337/149 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC ) and imposing sentence of S.I. for one year under Section 148 of , to undergo S.I. for six months under Section 323 read with Section 149 of , to undergo S.I. for three months under Section 337 read with of and to undergo S.I. for three years under Section 325 read with of and directing the substantive sentences to run concurrently.
2. It is the case of the prosecution that the informant, Badan Kanhar (P.W.2), a resident of village Landapadar under Kantamal Police Station, and his wife Sumitra (P.W.1), have got cultivable land locally known as Landakhol Chhak. On 12.11.1993 at about 7 A.M., while they were reaping paddy from the said land, the p
The Court held that it was appropriate to grant probation to the convicted individuals based on their long-standing conduct and the nature of the offenses under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.
Probation may be granted under the Probation of Offenders Act considering age and lack of criminal history despite prior convictions for violent offenses.
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's conviction, emphasizing limited scrutiny of evidential assessments, and extended probation based on the Petitioners' ages and lack of subsequent offense....
The court upheld the trial court's convictions for outraging modesty and arson, confirming that decisions on evidence were sound and legal.
Convicted individuals may be granted probation under the Probation of Offenders Act based on age, societal integration, and absence of further criminal activity.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on reliable evidence, consideration of the circumstances, and the imposition of appropriate sentences and fines.
The main legal point established is the importance of corroborative evidence and the explanation of delay in lodging an FIR in determining the conviction of the accused.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
