SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 420

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
R.K.PATTANAIK
Ashok Muthamajhi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. M. K. Chand, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. P.K. Sahoo, Asc

Table of Content
1. challenge to disqualification order based on natural justice. (Para 1 , 2)
2. opposite parties' defense of disqualification proceedings. (Para 3)
3. court's analysis of procedures followed during hearings. (Para 4 , 7)
4. arguments regarding right to confront evidence before disqualification. (Para 5 , 6)
5. disqualification based on number of children as per statutory provisions. (Para 8 , 10)
6. conclusion and dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT :

1. Instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned order dated 7th November, 2025 as at Annexure-4 disqualifying him as the Sarpanch of Marlang Gram Panchayat as illegal and in violation of principles of natural justice, hence, therefore to be quashed with a consequential direction to opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 to restore his position on the grounds inter alia that such exercise of jurisdiction in terms of Section 26 of Odisha Grama Panchayats Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) is not in accordance with law.

3. On the contrary, the opposite parties refuted the claim of the petitioner, filed the counter affidavit and pleaded therein that such a complaint was received

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top