Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Sabitri Patra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hybrid proceedings and background of writ petitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments against disciplinary actions. (Para 4) |
| 3. state's defense and justification for proceeding. (Para 5) |
| 4. court's analysis of procedural failures. (Para 6) |
| 5. disposal of writ petitions and order execution. (Para 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT :
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, J.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.
3. Since all these three Writ Petitions have been filed challenging the order of punishment passed on 18.03.2019 in three different disciplinary proceedings initiated against the deceased employee Jay Chandra Patra, all the matters were heard analogously and disposed of by the present common order.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that the deceased employee while in service three different departmental proceedings were initiated against him vide Memorandums dtd.13.01.1982, 03.01.1986 and 31.12.1991. In all those proceedings, the deceased employee not only participated in the proceeding, but also participated in the enquiry.
4.1. However, on the face of such participation o
Disciplinary proceedings must adhere to statutory procedures; failure to follow these renders resultant penalties unsustainable.
Disciplinary proceedings against a retired government servant must comply with statutory requirements, including issuing a second show-cause notice and following appropriate rules for post-retirement....
Disciplinary proceedings against a retired employee can continue if initiated during service; defining grave misconduct under pension rules does not require explicit mention in charges, as grave alle....
Failure to issue a second show-cause notice as required by Rule 15(10)(i)(b) invalidates the disciplinary punishment, emphasizing adherence to procedural fairness.
Disciplinary action requires compliance with procedural rules; failure to conduct an enquiry renders the imposition of penalties invalid.
Pension withholding under CCS (Pension) Rule 9 requires explicit finding of grave misconduct; absent it, order quashed.
Departmental proceedings against a retired employee cannot be initiated more than four years after the relevant event, as per Rule 7(2)(b)(ii) of OCS (Pension) Rules, 1992.
The legal heirs of a deceased delinquent employee are entitled to prosecute the proceedings, and the President of India is the disciplinary authority for group-A posts, with no right of appeal availa....
Post-retirement, only President can impose penalties affecting pension; subordinate authorities lack power to review or initiate de-novo proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
