PURNENDU SINGH
Akhilesh Kumar Sharma son of Late Kedar Nath Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PURNENDU SINGH, J.
Heard Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, learned counsel along with Mr. Awnish Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Dinesh Maharaj, learned AC to AAG-11 for the State and Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, learned counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar.
2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the manner in which the departmental proceeding has been initiated against him and several orders have been passed one after another even after intervention of this Court. Finally, the present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 15.10.2019 contained in Memo No. 9267 dated 17.10.2019. The operating part of the order is reproduced hereinafter:
^^4- Jh 'kekZ }kjk ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky;] iVuk esa nk;j lh0MCy;w0ts0lh0 la0&2015@2015 esa ekuuh; U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad&06-02-2017 dks ikfjr vkns'k ds vkyksd esa foHkkxh; vf/klwpuk la0&9009≶&ifBr Kkikad&9010 fnukad&06-10-2017 ,oa 'kqf) i= la0&3152 fnukad&02-04-2018 }kjk Jh 'kekZ dks lalwfpr c[kkZLrxh n.Mkns'k dks foHkkxh; vf/klwpuk la0&11451 ¼Hk0½ fnukad&11-11-2014 ls fujLr dj fn;k x;k ,oa fcgkj isa'ku fu;ekoyh 1950 ds varxZr iqu% foHkkxh; ladYi Kkikad&4038 ¼Hk0½ fnukad&15-05-2017 }kjk foHkkxh; dk;Zokgh lafLFkr dh x;h ,oa bl
B.C. Chaturvedi v. Union of India [(1995) 6 SCC 749 : 1996 SCC (L&S) 80 : (1996) 32 ATC 44
Roop Singh Negi vs. Punjab National Bank since reported in (2009)2 SCC 570
State of NCT of Delhi and another v. Sanjeev alias Bittoo reported in (2005) 5 SCC 181
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.